Most creators treat AI video tools as interchangeable, then get frustrated when one fails on the wrong job.
Runway, Veo 3, and Flora are different instruments; I broke down which fits which brief, and how that changes the way you scope and price, in this walkthrough for Contra University.
Watch it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BoNi7OPeZc
What if you could build a lookbook without a photographer, a location, or a model?
I put Krea's new K2-alpha model to the test using my studio's visual identity as the creative brief, feeding in my moodboard and letting the style transfer do the heavy lifting.
Honestly impressed with where this thing landed.
#Krea #AIDesign #MotionDesign #Biathlon #CreativeWorkflow
After exploring brand directions with Melius () last week, the next thing to figure out was where the brand actually lives.
So I used Claude Design to work on my personal creative studio's web presence and pitch deck, and to see where it's strong and where it still falls short.
Results below:
Used my own studio's brand development as the test case for Melius (https://www.melius.com/), an AI agent canvas. My results in this video: where it produced work I'd genuinely use and where I'd still bring in traditional production. Overall for early stage brand development, this is one of the most impressive tools I've used.
15
62
4.7K
My Creative AI Video Workflow:
Claude for creative ideation, Google Whisk for visual references, Flora for motion prototyping, then Runway or Veo 3 for final footage generation.
Each tool handles a specific stage of the pipeline, prototype cheap, generate strategically, then bring it all together in After Effects. The real skill isn't using AI for everything, it's knowing when traditional methods still win.