V2 is more visually appealing and easier to understand!

the v2 i better in my oppinion , becasue the font of the text is more clear and attractive than the v1

V1 has a bit more movement that is happening with the text that draws your eyes to it!

V1 for me. The slightly condensed serif feels more confident at small scale—which matters because a sparrow-tier brand will live mostly in tiny contexts (favicons, app icons, embedded chips). V2 reads a touch wider and loses bite. Pro tip: squint at both at 16px on a phone...

The V2 looks better.

V1 - I like the way you created the "R"

V2 feels complete the whitespace in the V1 makes it feel something is missing Great concept in between Michal

none. you still got to decide which is the hero element in the full logo - composed of the wordmark (sparrow) + and the mark (the S-shaped Sparrow illustration). Currently I see the emphasis on the "O" letter and also the "S-shaped" bird.

From the 2 versions, I would keep the...

Im going with V2 since its easier to read in a quick glance. If you look fast to the first version you read ''parrow''

Great work on both versions! I personally prefer V2 — the cleaner icon style and the updated typography feel more modern and polished. The bold, sans-serif letterforms really make the sparrow motif stand out. Best of luck with your branding!

v1

I prefer Vs 2

I go with V1, looks more professional

V2, readability is everything. V1 is cool, and if it were for a T-shirt or something i could see it, for a logo - V2 99.44%

V1 for me, simpler and interestingly beautiful with the used font, excellent job by the way! 💯 🔥

V1 for Sure if its CALM BRAND V2 for QUICK AND STRATEGY BRAND

V2

V2 is better 👍

i would vote for V1