The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Taste Test
Recently I've been working on a wellness app onboarding.
Here are two different directions I'm exploring. I'd love to hear your thoughts. Which one do you like more? π
10 voted
43%
13 voted
57%
23 votes
Closed
Both looks great at design and feels accesible while pishes me to engage. Whilst second option isn't bad, i didn't feel the simplicity and act of engagement on that one. So i will go with the option B
Went with Option A, the encouraging line at the bottom does more for retention on day one than a bigger hero number. New users need reassurance before they need precision.
Option B looks great.
I did go for option B
as a user of fitness apps for years, i had to go for option a! i think highlighting the numerals together makes them clearer to the viewer, showing that the app erases any potential for confusion in asking them to register chart info primarily. great work!
Option B. Even though it looks pretty, the diagram on Option A is hard to understand as it doesn't have the y-axis.
β’ Jul 22
Option B
Option B, I think what many miss about fitness apps, users want to see their progress in a clear visible form, so the progression graph is a win.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Challenges
View all
Related posts
Clientβs choice vs. Designerβs choice π
Iβm currently working on a branding project for Massage & Mocktails β a concept built around couples learning massage together in a relaxed, social atmosphere.
These are two early, black & white directions from Stage 2 of my branding process, before moving into color, typography, and the full visual system.
The interesting part?
My client chose Concept 1. I chose Concept 2.
Now Iβm curious what other creatives think.
Which direction would you choose β 1 or 2? And why?
Sometimes the most interesting part of branding is seeing how differently a client and a designer respond to the same brief.
21 voted
44%
27 voted
56%
48 votes
Closed
Concept 2 for me. That interlocking figure mark reads as two people meeting, which is the actual brief here, so it gives you more to build a system on. Concept 1 is the safer, more literal pick, which is usually why clients reach for it.
HOW MUCH GUIDANCE DOES A PASSWORD FIELD NEED?
For this desktop sign-up screen, I explored two ways to guide users while creating a password:
A - Detailed. A checklist displays every requirement and updates as the user types.
B - Minimal. A strength indicator provides quick feedback while keeping the interface cleaner.
The checklist offers more clarity, while the strength bar reduces visual noise.
Which approach would you choose - A or B?
39 voted
66%
20 voted
34%
59 votes
Closed
Detailed layout entails a guide to help users create strong passwords. Not everyone is good at crafting passwords, and this approach can makes them find it easy to remember.
Which cover gets your vote? π
Iβm finally sharing this case study and Iβm stuck between these two.
1 or 2? Which one would you click first? π
14 voted
34%
27 voted
66%
41 votes
Closed
