Two buttons. One choice. Which one works better — A or B? Drop your pick below.Two buttons. One choice. Which one works better — A or B? Drop your pick below.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
I see that. I actually had the same thought about Button 2, it feels more like a footer element, while Button 1 has a stronger sense of action and hierarchy.
Button 1 reads as the stronger primary action to me—the calmer green and tighter visual weight let the form hierarchy breathe. Button 2 feels more prominent, but its heavier footer-like block competes with the content.
The first is a black woven speaker with a brass dial, set on a cream block against acid green, flat daylight, the wordmark printed small on the grille, a heavy black sans headline across the top.
The second is the same speaker shot close and low on teal velvet, the weave filling the frame, a brass plate on the grille and the dial catching the only warm light, the headline in cream serif.
The first is an amber jar with a cream label standing on warm oak beside a glass of water, mimosa in a stone vase at the edge, linen in the corner, low sun laying long shadows across a buttercream wall.
The second is the same jar tipped on its side on deep navy, shot close and low, two clear capsules of golden powder in front, light pooling amber on the surface beneath.
One sells the routine. The other sells the formula.
The first is a brushed steel hand grinder with a brass band and a walnut knob, standing alone on deep teal, one shaft of light falling across it from the left, its shadow stretching to the right.
The second is the same grinder laid flat on red, shot from above, its steel cup full of fresh grounds beside it, beans scattered at the corners, a wooden bowl of them at the top, rust linen folding in at the edge.