If you do motion, you know this choice is never small. Two fly-ins, same scene. A or B?If you do motion, you know this choice is never small. Two fly-ins, same scene. A or B?
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
If you do motion, you know this choice is never small. Two fly-ins, same scene. A or B?

12 votes

Ends in 1d

Sagar's avatar
B hits different for me! That glowing orb trail adds so much more personality than a plain text fly-in. But A is cleaner if you want minimal. I'd ship B! 🚀
Mark's avatar
Thank you for your detailed response
Samuel's avatar
I love option 2
Mark's avatar
Thanks, Samuel
Elvira's avatar
I’d go with Option 1! I’m a big fan of kinetic typography, and I love how the moving text builds curiosity before revealing the message. 🙌
Mark's avatar
I'll know that you're fans of kinetic typography
Mark's avatar
Thanks a lot
Mark's avatar
Can you share what exactly do you like in this animation? Thanks
Ebad's avatar
2... good from the start...
Mark's avatar
Thanks, Ebad 🙌
Mostafa's avatar
Option 2 is unique ❤️
Mark's avatar
thanks, Mostafa. Apreciate it
Irkham's avatar
2. The orb actually does what the line says: it travels the path and links the apps, so "connecting the dots" is shown, not just typed. In 1 the words, the phone and the flying icons share the frame at the same time, and my eye didn't know where to land first
​Apexline 's avatar
Good work🔥 I choose 2 ; feel more solid 🚀
Joyjit's avatar
Option 2 creates more curocity where they are going. It looks interesting.
Daxesh's avatar
Option 2 is unique, but readability and access is better in Option 1, so will go with 1
Back to feed
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started