The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
A 1-day design challenge I gave myself was to build a brand based on my experience. So I built an athletic wear brand for people who don’t want to wear a fashion piece but rather something built for athletics instead.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
A little design exploration for practice ✨
This time, I’m working on a concept for a lighting brand.
Which direction do you prefer?
74 voted
70%
31 voted
30%
105 votes
Closed
Atmospheric, for a lighting brand it feels almost unfair not to show the product actually doing its job in a real room. The minimal version reads more like a furniture catalog to me. Is Lumeria leaning toward a specific price point or market that would push this one way or the other?
Inspiration design of the day 🔥
There's a shop in Barcelona that sells vintage prints from artists long gone.
On one of my visits, I found myself completely drawn to the way they used to illustrate flowers, fruits, objects, animals. A real exercise in consistent observation, one that's been lost in a generation...
AEROVA - Brand Direction
Exploring two visual directions for AEROVA, a wind-energy brand built around the idea of “Invisible force. Visible progress.”
Both directions use the same identity system, but create a different feeling:
Option A - Deep Green
Option B - Soft Blue
Which direction feels stronger for AEROVA?
27 voted
77%
8 voted
23%
35 votes
Closed
The soft blue palette feels more airy and closer to wind energy! Deep green is so overused in the energy industry so definitely option B.