Exploring two ways to frame the same section for Nimbus — a creative workspace for collecting sca...Exploring two ways to frame the same section for Nimbus — a creative workspace for collecting sca...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Exploring two ways to frame the same section for Nimbus — a creative workspace for collecting scattered thoughts, references, and unfinished ideas.
Which one would you choose for this section: Title Top Left or Title Bottom Left?
I believe title top is better since it has the main message so the time users will take to understand what this website all about is none but I love the description part of the second one which means title in top and description of the second one in the bottom is the best one in my personal opinion
Both frames look super clean! I’m leaning toward Title Bottom with the card—it gives the section such a nice structure and hierarchy. Beautiful work on Nimbus! ✨
I like top left. It gives the section a stronger entry point and makes the content hierarchy feel more intentional. Bottom left feels slightly more secondary here.
Seems like you uploaded transparent background images, so I can only appreciate the small thumbnails. I would combine the two. Heading should be at the top, and the white card is a nice structural accent.
I think having the title at the top is easier to read. The diagonal layout creates a clear visual hierarchy, guiding the eye naturally from top to bottom. Nice work!
Great comparison! I'd go with "Title Bottom" too — it feels more natural to read, the eye flows from the visual straight into the message. "Title Top" feels a bit more conventional/safe in comparison. Nice exploration! 🙌
I would go Title Bottom with the card. For a collect-and-organize product like Nimbus, the card visually models what the app does, turning a loose section into one tidy container, so the form reinforces the promise.
Hero 1 shows the hero text very well but you might need to work on the Hero CTA for "join the masterclass", I will probable miss it as a key action if I was a regular user
A brilliant SaaS tool needs a landing page that instantly builds trust and drives action.
I recently put together this visual upgrade for OpenTag to explore how tightening the layout could elevate their first impression.
Option A (The Original): Strong product copy, but the split layout and floating elements create competing focal points that divide the user's attention.
Option B (The Redesign): Centered messaging, a much clearer visual hierarchy, and a dynamic, breathable layout. The goal was to remove distractions and let the product interface take center stage.
Which direction do you think communicates the value better and creates a stronger first impression?