Been low-key obsessed with faceless travel vlogging for years — the wrapped scarf, the hood, the ...Been low-key obsessed with faceless travel vlogging for years — the wrapped scarf, the hood, the ...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Been low-key obsessed with faceless travel vlogging for years — the wrapped scarf, the hood, the never-quite-turning-to-camera. Every creator in that space still shows their face eventually. Mine doesn't. Ever.
So I designed Offseason Ghost: a full fictional brand identity built entirely around a creator who refuses to be seen.
Motion, powder, spray, blur: concealment through velocity, not a mask.
First case study I've made where the concept was personal before it was a brief.
Marigold is a one day concept for envato's human by design challenge. i set the direction in real photography first then generated against that standard.
I’m currently working on a branding project for Massage & Mocktails — a concept built around couples learning massage together in a relaxed, social atmosphere.
These are two early, black & white directions from Stage 2 of my branding process, before moving into color, typography, and the full visual system.
The interesting part?
My client chose Concept 1. I chose Concept 2.
Now I’m curious what other creatives think.
Which direction would you choose — 1 or 2? And why?
Sometimes the most interesting part of branding is seeing how differently a client and a designer respond to the same brief.
Concept 2 for me. That interlocking figure mark reads as two people meeting, which is the actual brief here, so it gives you more to build a system on. Concept 1 is the safer, more literal pick, which is usually why clients reach for it.