Really like that you're showing Ever inside actual app icon contexts instead of just a static logo lockup, it tells you so much more about how the brand will actually live day to day. For a lifestyle and clothing brand, was digital even part of the original brief or did that come later?
Love the direction of this exploration 👏 The identity feels modern and versatile, with a strong lifestyle character that could translate beautifully across clothing, packaging, and digital.
In my INKFLESH identity work, the wordmark runs off the can's curve and gets partly hidden behind artwork on posters. That crop asks the rest of the identity to carry more recognition. The mark has a job when the name is only partly there.
Same flower house, same layout. We only took the color out.
1. Full color. The iridescent petals do the selling: lilac, pink, a little shimmer. The photo is the brand, and every accent on the page borrows from it.
2. Monochrome. No color at all. Shape, texture and typography have to carry everything, and the page suddenly reads like a gallery catalogue.
Color sells the flower. Monochrome sells the exhibition.
The problem with monochrome is that, throughout computer history, it has conditioned users to associate gray and monochrome with being disabled, dysfunctional, or something to ignore and avoid.