Fintech for agriculture doesn’t have to look earthy, heavy or industrial.
With Fluna, the goal was to create something more premium, distinctive and forward-looking, while still feeling relevant to the market it serves.
What I value most about this project is its longevity. I created this identity four years ago, and the client is still using the logo and visual system today.
For me, good taste in branding is not about following a visual trend. It’s about making choices that still feel right years later, and building a system strong enough to evolve with the company.
The visual identity is starting to take shape, so I wanted to see how the logo could behave once it moves.
I explored two directions.
Option 1 is sharper and more engineered. Angular fragments build the mark, a controlled energy pulse moves across the frame, and the wordmark reveals with a more technical, performance-led feel.
Option 2 is quieter. Smaller movements, cleaner reveals, fewer elements, and a much more minimal sense of precision.
Same identity, two very different personalities.
I’m leaning toward one already, but curious which direction feels more YONU to you.
Exploring how the YONU mark behaves in motion while the identity is still developing makes sense. Are these intended for a short logo sting or a longer brand sequence?