The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Taste Test
option 2 looks clean and giving luxury vibe and the font the logo the color is matching 🔥 🙌
Absolutely option B, because they are defining the brand and look very premium 😍
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
This is my submission for the CapCut Design Studio Challenge 🎬✨, where I chose Direction A: CapCut as a Different Industry.
For this concept, I reimagined CapCut as a cultural streetwear label 👕🔥 - a fashion brand built on the idea of remixing identity.
Inspired by CapCut’s language of cutting, layering, and transforming, the brand shifts from a creative editing tool into a wearable expression of culture, movement, and individuality 🌍⚡. Every piece carries the energy of modern creator culture while blending it with handcrafted cultural details, embroidered textures, bold silhouettes, and flame-inspired visual elements 🧵🔥.
This is not just clothing; it is a new way of wearing your story.
The brand celebrates the new generation of creators - people who do not simply follow culture, but cut it, remix it, and make it their own ✂️🎨.
Wear the Remix. 🖤🔥
Awesome
Need your opinions, guys
Which homepage direction works better?
A or B
39 voted
32%
82 voted
68%
121 votes
Closed
A few months ago I found out a premium brand was using a logo I designed for a client. Identical.
It's been heavy. But it pushed me to finally get more serious about the legal side, contracts, ownership. Still in it. But my process is different now.
It also opened my eyes to how often this happens in smaller ways we just normalize.
The image I'm sharing isn't that case. It's another example: an old mockup of my work (left), duplicated with AI by another designer to sell their work.
Designers using finished work from other creatives as "moodboards" to sell their own services. Identical systems in the same industry with no acknowledgment.
I'm not here to call anyone out. This also made me stop and ask myself what practices I might be doing wrong without thinking twice. With everything AI is making possible right now, how do we even define the line anymore? I'm here to ask: where do you draw the line between referencing and taking, and what measures have you put in place?
Using other designers' work in a moodboard to communicate a direction or aesthetic is completely normal. Presenting that work as your own, or using it to sell your services without proper attribution, is INSANEEE!
What happened to you is honestly crazy. Seeing your mockups and...
Challenges
View all
Trending
Claude
Claude has entered the design space. How are you using Claude Design?
Contra University
Learn from expert creatives how to earn more using next-gen AI tools.
creativeaiflow
Creative AI workflows are evolving. What tools do you use, and what are their strengths and weaknesses?
portfolioreview
The best portfolios tell a story, not just show a grid. Share yours for feedback.
freelancerlife
Freelancer life is wins, pivots, and everything in between. What’s yours right now?