A/B testing the hero section, same neural energy, two different visual directions. Which one look...

A/B testing the hero section, same neural energy, two different visual directions. Which one look...A/B testing the hero section, same neural energy, two different visual directions. Which one look...

The network for creativity

Join 1.25M professional creatives like you

Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free

Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started

Back to feedPost

Taste Test

Create your own

Anush | Foundrline

max

• 9h

A/B testing the hero section, same neural energy, two different visual directions. Which one looks good? . . More of this over on X, in real time ideas, questions, and the people building cool stuff https://x.com/rightnextstep?s=11

Kajabi Web Development websitedesign

7 votes

Ends in 1d

OLABISI ABAYOMI

pro

• 9h

Hero section 3 look nice

Sekinat Akinrinde

• 6h

Hero section 2💯

Aligwe Maryjane

• 1h

Beautiful project.

Serge Herasymchuk

max

• Aug 11

Should animation simply catch attention, or invite interaction?

In the first version, the abstract form continuously transforms on its own. It keeps the hero section dynamic and atmospheric without requiring any action from the user.

In the second version, the object reacts to cursor movement through a parallax effect. The experience becomes more playful, immersive, and responsive.

One gives users something to watch. The other gives them something to influence.

Which approach works better for a hero section: automatic motion or interactive animation?

Web Design

79 voted

82%