The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Most landing pages show features. This one generates them.
Designed a multi-section landing page for an AI-powered web platform that personalizes ad experiences in real time.
The challenge here wasn't aesthetics — it was hierarchy. How do you explain a complex AI product without losing the user in the first scroll?
My approach:
→ Lead with the outcome, not the technology
→ Use UI mockups inside the design to show the product in action
→ Break features into digestible sections with clear labels
→ Let numbers do the trust-building (1500+ pages, 5x conversions, 30% cost drop)
The orange accent wasn't random , it needed to feel urgent and action-driven without looking aggressive.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Trending
retrofuturism
Share your favorite designs from the past exploring the distant future. Or your own take on the aesthetic 🚀
halftone
Dots. Texture. Grain. Let's see your designs using the halftone technique.
Midjourney
Creatives are showing off what they're making with Midjourney.
colorgrade
Video editors sound off: How do you enhance the mood of your video in color grading?
Related posts
I’ve been exploring motion and design for Gambo Café's hero: a danish pastry / colombian beans café in Copenhagen... and I ended up liking both concepts for completely different reasons. Now I genuinely can’t decide which direction feels stronger!
Which one would you choose, 1 or 2? Feedback is always appreciated!
27 voted
23%
89 voted
77%
116 votes
Closed
Image driven is the way to go for me, it suits the caffe industry. Nice work on both.
Two hero section directions for a client site- same headline, different visual approach. which one lands better?
.
.
More of this over on X, in real time ideas, questions, and the people building cool stuff https://x.com/rightnextstep?s=11
27 voted
51%
26 voted
49%
53 votes
Closed
The reason I chose Hero 1 is that the design style feels fresh and modern. I also think the image beneath the hero text complements the message really well, which makes the whole section feel more cohesive. That’s my perspective.
Veranda, a luxury residential concept landing page
Veranda is a concept build I created for a fictional luxury residential brand. It is not client work or a real property. The images and hero motion were generated with AI as part of the creative process.
I wanted to explore something that matters when building high-fidelity landing pages: after several rounds of changes, how do you make sure the final page still looks like the design that was approved?
The site is built in Next.js with responsive layouts, self-hosted fonts, GSAP motion and an interactive walkthrough. I also built in a proper QA process around it, not just checking that the page loads and the buttons work.
It compares 12 sections across five screen sizes against approved visual baselines. It flags visual drift, missing baselines and changes that have not been reviewed. I also tested interactions, accessibility, contrast, performance, browser behaviour and reduced-motion states.
The main lesson for me was simple: a page can pass functional tests and still no longer be the page that was agreed.
Building a QA process that flags visual drift against approved baselines is such an underrated skill, most people just eyeball it after changes go in. What first made you start checking for that instead of trusting the build looked right?