Which one feels stronger? π Same logo, two different animation directions. Which version would y...Which one feels stronger? π Same logo, two different animation directions. Which version would y...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Version 2 for me. The full lockup building in with that glow gives it more weight, and pairing the mark with the wordmark helps people actually connect the two when they see the icon alone later. Version 1 is cleaner but reads more like a loading spinner than a brand moment.
We're cutting the promo reel for our case study and can't agree on its start. β¨
Which product ad opening would make you stay past the first 3 seconds?
Vote and tell why! π
Same data, two different ways to experience it π€
I exploredΒ two patient list layoutsΒ for a mental health platform: a card view and a table view.
Cards feel more visual and personal, but space is limited and adding more information can quickly make them crowded. ForΒ complex enterprise products, I often find tables more practical β theyβre easier to scan, compare, sort, and can support more columns when users need greater visibility.
For this kind of workflow, Iβm leaning toward theΒ table view. Which would you choose βΒ cards or table?
For a mental-health patient list the choice isn't really card vs table β it's scan-speed vs context. The card wins the first meeting because the photo and name set the clinician's mental model before they touch the row, but the table is what holds up under the daily rhythm of...