The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Taste Test
Which Layout do you like?
Version 1 : Editorial Grid
A more dynamic composition that gives the story, metrics, and visual equal emphasis.
Version 2 : Balanced Split
Clear separation between the visual and content, making the case study easy to scan.
3 voted
60%
2 voted
40%
5 votes
Closed
Editorial grid looks super premium
Thank you!
Most welcome. was it for areal client?😊
Thank you!
Editorial is great! You can try the CTA in the bottom of image. It will give the metrics some space
Good suggestion. Thanks!
I’d go with V1. It feels more dynamic and gives the case study more personality.
Editorial Grid 🙌 it feels more like a story than just a layout. But I’m curious, did you test both with a longer case study? I feel like the split version might hold up better once there’s a lot more content.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Took a WebGL fabric physics simulation and pushed it to the absolute limit.
Built a complete visual concept for a Peptides brand around it. Pure interaction, zero boring static layouts. Let's go!
Pushing fabric physics that far for a peptides concept is a strong choice. The quiet editorial layout lets the motion carry the brand instead of competing with it.
One website, two moods.
Version A: sage + terracotta = warm, natural, approachable
Version B: burgundy + black = bold, refined, high-end
Color alone shifts how "expensive" a brand feels.
Which one would you trust more?
0 voted
0%
3 voted
100%
3 votes
Closed
Two ways to build the same fitness app.
A: AI-first. No tabs, no dashboards. The app is one conversation with a coach that already knows you slept six hours and squatted heavy on Tuesday. You log sets by talking. The plan rewrites itself mid-workout.
B: The modern standard. Home, today's workout, set-by-set logging, class booking, progress. Everything a member expects, done properly.
Same brand, same components, same build quality. The only real difference is how much you're asking the user to unlearn.
Most gyms should ship B. A few should bet on A.
Which one would you open tomorrow morning?
1 voted
25%
3 voted
75%
4 votes
Closed
Going with A here, the idea of the plan rewriting itself mid-workout instead of you scrolling a dashboard feels like where fitness apps eventually land. Would you actually ship the AI-first version to real users right now, or is it more of a thought experiment at this stage?