I was reading a while back on a concept on the disciple of Jesus in the Bible who betrayed him, Judas Iscariot, this theory proposed, and many would find this quite heretic, to say the least, it looked at things from the vantage point of Judas, because over time, people have mostly seen things from every other vantage point than that of the perpetrator, we find that even in our days now. From Judas’ point of view, the author of the theory proposed that Judas’ intent might have not been to sellout Jesus to his death seeing that immediately after he learned that Jesus was going to be killed he tried to redeem himself somewhat by giving back the money he was paid for his service and when this was not collected back by the Pharisees, he threw the money there at the temple and went out and in guilt or remorse or both, hung himself (Matthew 27:3–8). This means that Judas’ intention was not to harm Jesus but perhaps wanted Jesus to learn a lesson of some sort, or maybe he wanted Jesus to be more conforming to the Pharisees because he, Judas, used to be a tax collector and he was the one in charge of the bursary in Jesus’ ministry, he realized that Jesus’ non-conformity to the Pharisees was costing them money and they stood a better chance of making more money if they would join forces, therefore the plan was to sell Jesus out, scare him a bit and have him do their bidding and they would have more money to spend and live the lives Judas had always wanted for them (at least that's how I understood it so far), and just as plans mostly are, it didn't happen how he expected and realising the immensity of the damage he had caused decided in his own way to fix it and ended up eliminating himself for not being able to rectify the damage he had done.