Context
A representative B2B SaaS questionnaire contains recurring security questions and an internal evidence set.
Method
I map each question to an authorised evidence reference, distinguish supported answers from items requiring an evidence owner, and keep missing or conflicting support visible for human review.
What this demonstrates
A buyer can see the review state instead of receiving confident guesses. This is a self-initiated spec project using fictional data. It does not claim a client engagement, testimonial, certification, procurement acceptance, or business result.
Synthetic workflow showing question-to-evidence mapping, supported and gap states, and human approval for review-ready XLSX. No client data or outcome claimed.