The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Most AI design tools get tested on what they can generate. I tested Claude Design on whether it could work inside a system that already existed.
What I loved about it is that it reasons before it builds. It had a point of view. It flagged its own mistakes before I caught them.
What slipped a bit for me: give it nuanced information and it'll smooth it over to sound cohesive. It can lose accuracy chasing consistency.
It's more of a thinking collaborator than a generator - but the judgment calls are still yours.
Where do you draw the line with AI in your creative process? Drop it below.
(Full Breakdown👇🏻)
Great work overall
Is thaty ou on the video? Do you do video for other brands as well?
brillient!
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Claude Fable 5 just one-shotted this landing page.
check live lumio.apollostudio.design
prompts library lafys.com
yes i saw but have you read prompt? It was like full developer guidance a to z.
Today's design exploration started with a Dribbble inspiration piece.
Rather than copying it directly, I challenged myself to reinterpret the concept and experiment with a completely different visual direction.
The original inspiration uses vibrant blue and orange colors to create an energetic feel, while my version leans into a darker, more premium aesthetic.
A great exercise in studying design principles and then applying them through your own lens.
Question:
Which version do you prefer?
🟠 The colorful Dribbble-inspired version
⚫ My dark interpretation
22 voted
47%
25 voted
53%
47 votes
Closed
Dark mode always
You're in charge of the design. the tool's in charge of the execution.
said that in a tutorial i recorded for contra university and it's the most honest thing i know about where this work is going.
took a figma design, dropped it on the canvas, spun three variants off one client note, published a live clickable site. what used to be four or five revision rounds took about five minutes.
so when execution gets that cheap, it stops being the thing you sell. a client can get a polished working page out of one sentence now. what they still can't get is the call under it. who it's for. what it says. what it refuses to say.
I'm not nervous about teaching designers to move this fast, the faster everyone executes the more obvious it gets who can actually decide.
woooo it's live!
Challenges
View all
Trending
Claude
Claude has entered the design space. How are you using Claude Design?
Contra University
Learn from expert creatives how to earn more using next-gen AI tools.
MagicPath
The canvas is infinite, and exploration is becoming the workflow. How are you using MagicPath?
creativeaiflow
Creative AI workflows are evolving. What tools do you use, and what are their strengths and weaknesses?
freelancerlife
Freelancer life is wins, pivots, and everything in between. What’s yours right now?