Exploring AI-Driven Usability with Reality Check for DesignersExploring AI-Driven Usability with Reality Check for Designers
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Reality Check 🚀
Reality Check started with a question I kept asking myself while experimenting with AI design tools:
Can a real human actually survive this experience?
Today, AI can generate screens, assets, prototypes, and even complete user flows in seconds. But there is still one thing it doesn't tell us: how real people might experience what we create.
To explore that idea, I used ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini for research, brainstorming, UX exploration, and prompt development. I then used Figma Make to transform those ideas into a working product.
My prediction is that Figma's next AI chapter will be less about generating designs faster and more about helping designers understand the humans behind those designs.
We already have AI that can create screens, assets, and prototypes.
The next frontier is AI that can simulate outcomes.
How will a stressed user experience this?
Where will someone lose trust?
What happens when real life interrupts the perfect workflow?
Reality Check explores those questions through AI-simulated personas with goals, limitations, emotions, and behavioral patterns.
The application allows designers to test a design against synthetic users before investing in usability testing and before releasing products to market.
Importantly, Reality Check is not intended to replace usability testing.
Nothing can replace observing real people interacting with a product.
Instead, it acts as a design reasoning and pre-validation layer that helps teams identify friction, confusion, trust issues, and usability risks earlier in the design process.
The core concept behind Reality Check is the Reality Gap.
AI Audit Score measures how technically strong a design appears.
Human Experience Score measures how successfully a simulated user can actually use it.
Reality Gap is the difference between those two numbers.
The larger the gap, the more a design appears successful on paper while struggling in real human conditions.
For the Makeathon MVP, I focused on one complete flow:
Upload a design.
Select a persona.
Run a simulation.
Reveal the Reality Gap.
Review AI-generated findings.
Looking ahead, the natural next step would be a native Figma plugin. Using the Figma Plugin API, Reality Check could analyze selected frames directly inside Figma without requiring exports, bringing simulation and feedback directly into the design workflow.
Design systems gave us consistency.
AI generation gave us speed.
Maybe the next evolution is empathy systems.
Dylan's avatar
Contra logo
really nice and useful!
Svetlana's avatar
Thank you Dylan 🙌
Back to feed
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started