The grey bull with the flame horns (B) has way more attitude than the golden one, feels like it'd work on a streetwear drop rather than a finance client. Which way are you leaning yourself, and is this for a specific client or just portfolio exploration?
it depends , what is the purpose for it? because if it is for a restaurant brand selling meat, A is the way to go, but for a game/mobile app, B will do it better; what is your personal scenario?
Both can be used for different purposes. Choose A : if brand wants to show royalty or premium figure. Choose B: if it is something related to gaming, sports, racing related or anything other than premium show-off.
An independent concept exploring what a Champions League ball could look like through Nike’s visual language.
The idea starts with a star containing a Swoosh in the negative space, then extends into a complete ball system using Nike’s existing panel construction.
Designed and animated with Spline, After Effects, and a custom 3D ball tool built for the project.
Unofficial concept. Not affiliated with Nike or UEFA.
What influenced your vote more: the layout or the photography?
Two homepage directions for the same fictional lighting studio.
I’m curious whether seeing the product up close or seeing it in a space makes you want to explore more.
Atmospheric, and it was the photography that decided it. A lamp is a product you buy for what it does to a room, so seeing the warm glow pooling across a dark surface sells the feeling before the layout even registers. Sculptural is gorgeous but shows the object, Atmospheric shows the outcome.