Recruitment breaks down when too much lives in people’s heads.
As teams scaled, I saw the same issues repeat: inconsistent handoffs, unclear ownership, and decisions depending on who happened to be online. So I documented the full recruitment workflow, step by step, into clear SOPs the team could actually use.
These SOPs turned tribal knowledge into a repeatable system and reduced friction across recruiting, ops, and account management.
That's where Richard Reid's website was when we started working together. Richard is a psychology-led leadership coach for founders, CEOs and senior leaders, and his site was ranking. Just not for the right people.
When I sorted every search the site appeared for by intent, 60% were people researching psychology topics. Only 5% were people actually shopping for a coach.
So instead of chasing more traffic, I rebuilt the strategy around that 5%:
Mapped the private pressures each of his three audiences carries, from the 3am thought to what they're really buying
Separated his two sites so they stopped competing for the same searches
Restructured the service hubs
Rewrote the homepage and about page to lead with who he helps and what he solves, with one clear route to a consultation
The old homepage said "Elevate Your Leadership with Richard Reid". The new one tells a founder or C-suite leader, in the first line, that this is for them.
Both pages are live. Full case study on my profile.
If your site gets traffic but not enquiries, the fix usually isn't more traffic. It's knowing which visitors matter and writing for them.
Introducing an unfamiliar idea like how AI represents a company is tough, and PerceptionX handles it clearly. Nice to see the Webflow build carry that story through the page.
Your Logistics Team Shouldn't Have to Chase Every Shipment Manually. 🚢
A shipment is delayed. Your customer wants an update. Your operations team is checking carrier portals, copying tracking numbers into spreadsheets, and sending the same status emails repeatedly.
By the time everyone has the right information, the next shipment needs attention.
The problem isn't a lack of effort. It's disconnected logistics operations.
Common challenges:
Shipment updates scattered across multiple carrier systems.
Delayed shipments discovered too late.
Manual customer status emails.
Tracking spreadsheets that quickly become outdated.
Repetitive follow-ups between operations and customer service.
Limited visibility into shipment exceptions.
The solution: An automated logistics operations workflow built with n8n.
I can design an automation that connects carrier tracking APIs, your shipment database, and customer communication channels.
Instead of manually checking every shipment, your team receives structured updates when something actually needs attention.
What the automation handles:
📦 Shipment Tracking — Retrieve updates from supported carrier APIs.
📊 Operations Visibility — Maintain synchronized shipment records and exception histories.
🔁 Escalation Management — Notify the responsible team when an exception requires action.
The goal: Less repetitive tracking work, faster exception awareness, and more consistent customer communication.
Two ways we can work together:
Option 1: Already have carrier APIs, a TMS, or a defined tracking workflow? Share your requirements, and I'll help design the integration.
Option 2: Not sure which logistics tasks should be automated? We can map your shipment lifecycle and identify the highest-value starting point.
Make your logistics operations easier to manage as shipment volume grows.
Workflow architecture
Scheduled Trigger → Carrier API Request → Normalize Tracking Events → Match Shipment Records → Detect Status Changes → Route Exceptions → AI Summary → Customer Email / Operations Alert → Database Update
Implementation: Authenticate carrier integrations, normalize differing event codes, compare timestamps and event IDs, prevent duplicate alerts, route exceptions by severity, and log delivery failures for retry.
Benefits: Reduced manual tracking, clearer exception ownership, more timely customer updates, and an auditable shipment history.
Result: A centralized shipment monitoring workflow that allows operations teams to focus on resolving exceptions instead of repeatedly checking tracking portals.
The customs-hold exception is the one I'd find hardest to route, since it needs a different owner than a plain delay. Do you map each exception type to its own team in the escalation step, or is it one shared alert queue?