Iām currently designing the new landing page for SCI4DEV and got stuck between two hero section versions š
SCI4DEV is a technology company focused on AI solutions, automation, software development, and digital innovation for businesses, startups, and education.
Would love some honest feedback:
which version communicates the brand better? š
V1 reads better as a brand statement, V2 reads better as an ad. For SCI4DEV's actual landing page I'd lean V1 because the negative space lets the headline breathe, and SaaS buyers scan first then read. V2 has the swoosh fighting the type for attention, which is fine on a paid...
Thatās actually a really good point. Iāve been leaning more toward V1 for exactly that reason, it feels more aligned with SCI4DEVās positioning and gives the message more room to breathe. V2 was meant to feel more dynamic, but I agree it starts competing with the headline a bit.
Video-led hero for me. The big script Presence over the field sells a feeling in one glance, which is what wellness needs. The expanding gallery would work well as the second section.