The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Lately, I’ve been spending more time just building.
Right now I’m focused on:
→ AI automations that replace repetitive business tasks
→ Custom web apps (not templates) that actually solve workflows
→ Simple internal tools that save hours every week
I’m trying to move beyond just “making websites”
and more towards building things that actually solve problems.
Even in small ways — like saving time on repetitive tasks
or making everyday workflows a bit smoother.
Still experimenting, still learning —
but really enjoying this shift and where it’s heading.
If you're exploring something similar, would love to connect.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Two concepts. Two different first impressions.
Exploring two visual directions for a finance and AI platform.
Option A | Fundely
Warm gradients, soft curves, and a clean layout. Designed to make finance feel simple, approachable, and easy to trust.
Option B | Proxyma
Bold typography, a structured grid, and a striking 3D visual. Designed to make AI feel confident, modern, and forward-thinking.
Both share the same goal: create a strong first impression through design.
But which direction communicates better?
A or B? I'd love to hear your perspective.
5 voted
50%
5 voted
50%
10 votes
Closed
Adorable
Thumbs up
Clients often start with the same request: "Let's build an AI agent."
My counter-question is always: which manual process actually costs you time, errors, or money right now?
My selection rule: remove it first. If it can't be removed, simplify it. If it's still needed, automate it with a plain script. Only then add an integration or an agent. Often the best result is the process that no longer exists.
Safe automation means real scenarios, error handling, and alerts. Without alerts, a workflow can silently lose data for weeks. I always define what stays with a human and what goes to the system.
Question for you: which process would you automate first, and why is it still manual?
Service for audit and implementation: https://contra.com/s/BmWLbgFU-ai-automation-from-your-dream-to-working-implementation?r=auto_booster
Shopify Abandoned Cart Recovery Automation 🛒
Ever wondered how many potential orders an online store could miss when customers add products to their cart but leave without completing checkout?
I built an abandoned cart automation workflow using Activepieces, Shopify, Google Gemini, Gmail, and WhatsApp Business.
⚙️ How It Works
🛒 Cart Trigger: Detects an abandoned checkout event from Shopify.
🔀 Conditional Routing: Routes the workflow based on configured conditions.
🤖 AI-Powered Messaging: Gemini generates a personalized reminder message.
💬 WhatsApp Reminder: Sends a cart reminder through WhatsApp Business.
📧 Email Reminder: Sends a follow-up email to encourage the customer to complete checkout.
💡 How It Can Help E-commerce Businesses
Remind customers about products left in their carts.
Reduce repetitive manual follow-up work.
Make customer communication more consistent.
Create an opportunity to recover potentially lost sales.
Tools Used: Activepieces | Shopify | Google Gemini | Gmail | WhatsApp Business
Project Type: Personal Automation Project
I built this workflow to demonstrate how automation can support abandoned cart recovery for Shopify and D2C businesses.
Interested in automating your store's customer follow-ups? Let's connect.
The 30–60 minute delay then 24-hour follow-up is a sensible cadence. The part I would harden next is the stop conditions: once the cart converts or the customer replies, every channel should cancel, and WhatsApp especially needs a clear opt-in trail before the first send....