The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Evaluated 60 multi-turn conversations from a retail support AI to track context retention, persona consistency, and task completion across longer exchanges. Found that context drops clustered around the third and fourth turn, pointing to a memory window limitation rather than random failures, and flagged each instance with the exact turn where context broke down.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
A chatbot can sound helpful and still create a messy order.
When a customer changes a quantity or delivery detail, the real test is whether the system keeps the context, checks the information, and records the right request for the team.
In an 80-hour WhatsApp automation project, I built the conversation flow with structured AI output, input validation, order recording, logging, and error handling. The client rated the completed work 5.0.
That’s the part I care about most: turning a chat into a record people can actually work from, with errors visible when something goes wrong.
If your team takes orders through WhatsApp, what happens between the AI’s reply and the order record?
Order changes mid chat are where most WhatsApp bots fall apart. Did you confirm the changed details back to the customer before recording, or validate silently?
Customer Conversations is an AI that calls a store's customers and interviews them. Explaining that took half of every sales call.
Three weeks after Bryan Starck brought it to us, it had a brand and a homepage built to do the explaining. Answer three questions and the AI calls you for a real interview in 60 seconds.
Nice design
Aster gives support teams one place to monitor performance, diagnose chatbot weaknesses, and resolve customer issues with full context. Agents spend less time switching tools and searching for information, managers get clear visibility into where the AI succeeds and where it needs work, and routine lookups no longer require manual effort. The outcome is a faster, more consistent support operation built on data the team already had but couldn't previously see in one place.
Showing managers where the bot fails is the part most support tools skip. How do you decide when a conversation counts as a chatbot weakness versus a bad question?