The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Recently, I was testing different design approaches using Claude Code with an MCP connector across two different projects.
In one project, I used low-fidelity hand-drawn wireframes as input, while in the other I relied mainly on detailed text prompts.
The project where I provided visual wireframes produced significantly better results, as the visual direction helped generate much more structured, accurate, and usable designs compared to prompt-only workflows.
No doubt wireframes help alot in providing visual direction to the AI and get better and relevant outcome as compared to text prompts.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Currently building a new identity for an AI + fintech company in Dubai.
Still early, but this is one of the directions we’ve been exploring for the brand.
The idea was to avoid the usual “AI company” visual language and build something that feels more established, precise, and quietly futuristic.
We’ve been playing with geometry, light, and a much more restrained visual system around the mark.
Still developing this one, so I’m curious:
Would you push this direction further, or keep it this restrained?
Honestly the logo presentation is impressive
Brand guidelines fail when someone tries to use them. The PDF is complete. But when a developer needs something the system didn't anticipate, there's no logic to extend from. A style guide documents what exists. A system tells you what to do next.
Mind blowing job
I designed some fashion-inspired editorial layout explorations for the new fashion brand ASCIS
the layout system feels sharp.