The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
With over 20 years of experience in aircraft maintenance engineering, aviation training, and technical education, I specialize in converting technical knowledge into structured and easy-to-understand training content.
My services include:
-Technical Training Manuals
-Instructor Guides
-Student Training Materials
-Course Documentation
-Maintenance Training Documents
-Employee Training Manuals
-User Guides
-Learning Resources😊
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Developed a Kajabi-based wellness education platform
Kajabi Wellness Education Platform Development
Developed a Kajabi-based wellness education platform for Nilda that combined online learning, CRM integrations,...
this is amazing work
I thought the next step would be better software.
I started working with a client in a very niche professional-products sector, first as a technical writer. My background with Chinese documents, test reports, photos and files that need basic electrical knowledge was what they needed.
Then they asked me to build their spec sheets. I expected specialized software, or at least Figma or Adobe. Instead, all their spec sheets are built in PowerPoint.
Two things changed my mind:
PowerPoint is often seen as a low-value tool. It isn't, if you know how to approach it.
The tool matters, but what matters most is knowing your field: what a spec sheet has to say, to whom, and in what order.
Have you ever had to do serious design work in a tool you didn't expect to use?
The best engagement feature we shipped for Tribeversity was not a feature.
It was a small group of people expecting you to show up.
18% course completion was the benchmark. Interviews said the problem was isolation, not content. We rebuilt around cohorts, peer groups and visible progress instead of adding more courses.
64% completion, 3x daily actives, NPS 72.
Full case study on my profile.
Check it out
The interview finding gives the cohort decision a clear purpose. I’d make the first peer interaction a small, specific task tied to the lesson, so joining a group doesn’t become another thing learners have to figure out. What did you use as that first shared activity?
