Most architecture studios I look at have the same problem. The work is worth more than the site s...Most architecture studios I look at have the same problem. The work is worth more than the site s...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Lam's avatar
Lam Hoang
• Aug 8
Most architecture studios I look at have the same problem.
The work is worth more than the site says it is.
You see it in the enquiries. People arrive with a number already in their head, and it's lower than what the studio actually charges. The conversation starts from the wrong place, and someone has to spend the first call climbing back up to it.
I don't think that's a pricing problem. It's a reading problem.
Most studio sites are built like ordinary design websites. Small images in neat cards. Sections stacked with no order to them. Work that deserves to hold a room, sitting quietly in a grid.
So I studied how the top architecture studios present themselves — not the style, the structure. What they do differently is simpler than it looks.
They run the work large. They leave space around it. And every page moves toward one destination instead of listing everything at once.
That's what I built Meridian around.
Full-scale imagery, a calm layout that lets a project breathe, and a clear route through each page, so a visitor feels the level of the work before anyone mentions a fee.
A website can't raise your rates. But it can stop clients from guessing them wrong.
Check it out
FigmaFramerUI Design
Back to feed
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started