"Framer is bad for SEO." I hear this every week from people. It's wrong, and it's costing them clients. Here's the truth: Framer ranks fine. What doesn't rank is a site where nobody set the canonical tags, wrote real meta descriptions, or fixed the duplicate H1s that show up across breakpoints. That's not a Framer problem. That's a builder problem. I've shipped 60+ Framer sites. The ones that rank all have one thing in common ..someone who actually understood the SEO layer, not just the design layer. #Framer #SEO #WebDesign

This is exactly right. The duplicate H1s across breakpoints is the one that gets people most. Framer is perfectly capable of ranking well, it just requires treating the SEO panel like a real deliverable, not an afterthought.

New case study here My client had spent years building one of Ireland's most academically rigorous institutions in herbal and integrative medicine. The website made it look like a course catalogue.

The rebuild covered 26 pages restructured from the ground up, a three-collection CMS architecture, Shopify Buy Button integration for direct course purchases, automated TalentLMS student enrolment on payment, and a MailerLite nurture sequence for each programme pathway. The site needed to earn the trust of healthcare professionals before asking them to commit to a three-year accredited programme.

This is what a complex education build looks like.

The TalentLMS enrollment automation on payment is the kind of detail that makes or breaks an education site. A client trying to run a 3-year accredited programme cannot be manually enrolling students. That's a real operational win buried inside what looks like a design project. Nice work.