The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Here’s what I’ve been able to build so far:
-Added a smooth onboarding animation
-Global language locally switches the full app to the selected language
-Translation and language swap works in real time
Figma + Claude Code
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
How are you actually structuring your AI workflow right now - are your tools connected, or are you still using them separately?
I’ve landed on a pretty simple system using just Claude + Flora.
Claude is where I develop the thinking - my existing brand direction, concepts, and refining prompts until they actually reflect the creative intent behind the project.
Flora is where that intent becomes visual. It’s a node-based canvas, so I can generate imagery, iterate variations, drop in mockups, and build full product scenes in one connected system.
I don’t see AI replacing design thinking. I see it speeding up execution while I stay fully in control of direction, taste, and decisions.
Curious to hear from you guys 🤔
📢 What does your AI workflow look like right now?
📢 What tools are you actually using day to day?
📢 And is there anything you think I should check out?
Would love to hear how others are building their systems.
this is wonderful, i love your lightning!
Good design doesn’t ignore ideas – it helps you see the difference.
At the start of this Kajabi project, the client asked to use their Facebook banner as the website hero.
The reason was simple: they wanted everything to feel consistent with their social media.
And we totally respect that.
Even though we knew this approach usually doesn’t work well for a hero section, we always make sure our clients can see their idea in action.
So instead of pushing back – we did both:
👉 their version (social banner as hero)
👉 our version (optimized hero section)
What’s the difference?
The banner version keeps the visual style… but it doesn’t function as a real entry point to the page:
🧩no clear headline
🧩no defined offer
🧩no call-to-action
🧩no immediate clarity
Our version focused on one thing – clarity.
What we changed:
✔️ A confident, clear headline
✔️ A simple and understandable offer
✔️ A strong CTA
✔️ A modern, clean photo of the artist (easy to recognize)
We also:
- kept the original background to maintain brand consistency
- removed the extra logo (since it’s already in the header)
Result:
The client didn’t lose their visual identity, but gained something much more important:
👉 clarity
👉 structure
👉 direction
And in the end, they chose our version
Impressive thought process.
New Work: Auxia.io
Just shipped an interactive, story-driven Webflow build for Auxia.
This looks clean and well thought out. How long did it take you to bring everything together?
Trending
Runway
AI video generation is exploding. What are you dreaming up in Runway?
Contra University
Learn from expert creatives how to earn more using next-gen AI tools.
creativeaiflow
Creative AI workflows are evolving. What tools do you use, and what are their strengths and weaknesses?
portfolioreview
The best portfolios tell a story, not just show a grid. Share yours for feedback.
freelancerlife
Freelancer life is wins, pivots, and everything in between. What’s yours right now?