Just published a new case study on Behance π This time itβs ARDEN β a data & AI platform we desi...Just published a new case study on Behance π This time itβs ARDEN β a data & AI platform we desi...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Option 1's grid of screens sells the product complexity better, but option 2's hero shot feels more premium at first glance, which matters more for a case study cover imo. What's tipping the community's votes so far?
The answer depends. If you are looking to show a Brand, option 2 is better, but if you are looking to show the UX design, option 1 is more likely. Either way, it's great.
Two directions for Amber House, my real estate website template. The first pairs a closer architectural crop with an asymmetric layout. The second gives the building more breathing room, with a wide view and a centered headline.
Same template, two different first impressions. Which feels stronger to you, and why?
Really liked how these designs turned out!
Explored a concept for AI SaaS product, focusing on a clean interface and a simple, intuitive chat experience.
Tried two different layout variation for the hero section.
Which would you like?
I like the second layout more β the headline "Your ideas deserve an intelligent partner" + the chat preview below makes the AI feel real and easy to use immediately. The first one is also clean, but this one sells the product faster.