Avoiding the obvious is one of the hardest parts of branding. If the project is connected to the music industry, the first solution that comes to mind is almost always a note or an instrument. Everyone understands the category immediately, yes. But they probably won’t remember the brand. That symbol won’t tell you if the brand is about discipline, energy, intimacy, underground culture, technical precision, experimentation, or mass entertainment. A symbol becomes interesting when it’s transformed, reduced, connected with other elements, and brought into a visual system built around a specific problem. The work becomes interesting when you’re not simply representing the most obvious symbol, but interpreting the experience. A typographic composition that suggests rhythm. A grid that feels like timing. Empty space that makes you feel pause. A visual system that behaves like a composition, instead of simply showing a note. When design is too literal, it leaves you at the first level and becomes intellectually thin. Good branding goes deeper and becomes memorable.

Agreed!

Building a brand identity for a B2B tech consulting firm is harder than it looks, you need to sit at the table with McKinsey and BCG while owning something they can't

This is one of my proudest brand guideline projects. Helped WidaTech (Jakarta & Singapore) shape a new visual identity from strategy to system, 66 pages covering positioning, logo, color, typography, and imagery.

Looking for a brand designer for your next rebrand? Let's talk 🙌

Check it out

Very good and well animated