The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Taste Test
INTERACTIVE vs STATIC
Same type of content. Different experience.
Interactive - more engaging and dynamic.
Static - clear, simple, easy to scan.
Which one would you choose?
29 votes
Ends in 10h
love the layout of the static bit, but the color pop on interactive would be awesome to incorporate, as well as maybe the same upwards motion of each paragraph?
69 views but only 4 votes on the poll is an interesting gap on its own. I'd lean interactive for anything you want people to actually spend time with, not just skim. Did the Kajabi client have a strong opinion going in, or did you have to make the case for one over the other?
interactive, but maybe with less copy users can quickly skim
Static🔥
Both!!
I’d probably go with interactive if it adds value. Otherwise, simple and clear wins.
i feel like it all about the target audience you are building it for, interactive is nice but some people like static
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Trending
retrofuturism
Share your favorite designs from the past exploring the distant future. Or your own take on the aesthetic 🚀
halftone
Dots. Texture. Grain. Let's see your designs using the halftone technique.
Midjourney
Creatives are showing off what they're making with Midjourney.
colorgrade
Video editors sound off: How do you enhance the mood of your video in color grading?
Related posts
Which creative poster do you prefer?
8 voted
50%
8 voted
50%
16 votes
Closed
I love Option B because it’s so vibrant , it caught my attention instantly. But if the theme is humanity, I’d go with Option A. It feels calmer and softer, goes well with 'Humanity' 😊
This started as another experiment with halftone, but I wanted the dots to have a reason for being there rather than simply applying the technique as a surface effect.
The thought was: what if the dots were actually seeds?
From there, the idea became Studies in Reproduction — playing with two meanings of reproduction at once. Halftone is a way of reproducing an image through repeated marks, while a flower reproduces itself through seeds.
So the flower gradually breaks down into thousands of seed-like “dots”, with tiny versions of the flower appearing among them. From a distance they behave like halftone; up close, you discover the image is effectively reproducing itself.
I wanted to see how the same visual system behaves with different flowers, crops and tonal treatments.
24 voted
29%
58 voted
71%
82 votes
Closed
The double meaning of reproduction is the kind of concept that sounds simple in one sentence but is genuinely hard to execute without it reading as gimmicky, this pulls it off. Did any of the flowers or tonal treatments fail to hold up at the seed-dot scale, or did the system work cleanly across all of them?
Modern and Professional Electrician Services Website Design
Modern and Professional Electrician Services Website
Design
8 voted
89%
1 voted
11%
9 votes
Closed
Nice work, Tahraoui
I prefer option 1