Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5

Comment "Process" for the workflow to create this influencer, create these clips, and how I created this video.

Now, that being said, here are my thoughts on these 2 models from this instance:

Wan 3.0 did these 'jump cuts' with zoom-in and waist-length shots on its own, and that is promising, as it can save lots of time, since we had to do these manually in a video editor. These can feel great or abrupt depending upon your taste, and I don't mind fast jump cuts.

The audio (voice-over) from Wan 3.0 also sounded more real and alive in comparison to S2.5

The character in the Wan video also felt slightly "Human" or usual by the way she looked at the camera, or away from it, applied the serum, and she doesn't appear to be as performative as the one generated from Seedance 2.5

I love the continuity in the Seedance video; it just had 2 cuts, and the sound design was PERFECT.

I generated the Seedance video in 480p as I was short on credits, but even then the contrast, depth of field, and realism are very exciting. The 720p version would have surpassed Wan 3.0 in some places where it fell short in this instance.

I did these tests in @flora