I keep seeing the same problem with company websites:
they launch looking polished, but the moment the business changes, the site becomes a pain to manage.
- new product = needs dev help
- new campaign = needs a new page
- new messaging = site structure no longer fits
- small updates = internal team gets stuck
So I started thinking more about the stack decision itself.
A lot of teams jump into redesigning a website before asking whether the setup is actually right for their stage, team, and growth pace.
Because a website that works at go-live is not always a website that works 6 months later, I built a very simple tool to explore that idea:
It’s just a simple HTML/CSS/JS page that gives a recommendation based on things like company size, team structure, update frequency, and site complexity.
No tracking, no signup, no data collection. So, I’d genuinely love feedback from people here:
- does the logic feel useful?
- do the recommendations make sense?
- what would you improve or add?
I usually don't stop at 3 breakpoints when building a website.
Most people think about: Mobile, Tablet, Laptop
I like adding one more: Desktop
Because what looks great at 1440px can feel completely different at 1920px...
- The layout gets too wide.
- Spacing starts feeling off.
- Content loses its balance.
So I like testing the system across: Mobile → Tablet → Laptop → Desktop
Not because every website needs exactly 4 breakpoints. But because responsive design isn't about making a few screen sizes work.
It's about making the whole system work.
Follow Rushabh for more website fundamentals, experiments, and things I learn while building for the web.
Modern Digital Solutions & Web Development Website.
A clean, modern website design for a digital solutions company offering web development, mobile app development, digital marketing, and e-commerce solutions. The landing page highlights the company’s services, experience, overview, client testimonials, and a strong call-to-action for potential clients.
I’ve been razzmatazzing and flibbertigibbeting with Claude Code and somehow ended up with a new yels.dev.
It finally feels like me: simple on the surface, slightly complicated underneath, and very much alive.
You can see who I am, what I do, the work behind Herodot, RaptorLabs, CyberLink Security and Solmint, plus a selection of projects I’ve built across AI, cybersecurity, Web3, product systems, education, archives, and experimental digital spaces.
The simple-on-the-surface, layered-underneath idea comes through so clearly in the presentation. I especially like how the project archive turns the site into something to explore rather than just a résumé of links.