Perevu — Academic Review and Journal Discovery

Perevu is my academic-review product for researchers preparing a manuscript for submission. It brings manuscript feedback, review-depth selection and journal discovery into one product experience. The interface gives a detailed review process a clear structure: understand the checks, explore a sample finding, compare review options and continue into the submission workflow.

The public experience introduces a staged workflow, moving from manuscript intake and paper profiling through specialist checks, synthesis and final deliverables. Writing, structure, consistency, methodology, citations and statistics each have their own place in the interface. This makes the different types of feedback easier to understand before a researcher chooses a review level.

A central part of the experience is the interactive sample review. Visitors can switch between statistics, methodology, citation and style examples. Each finding connects a manuscript location with a severity label, supporting explanation and proposed revision. The methodology example traces a claim against its supporting evidence, while the statistics example presents original and recalculated values side by side. The layout keeps the issue, reasoning and suggested change together, making a dense review easier to scan.

The journal-discovery preview extends the workflow beyond editing. Selecting a journal changes a companion panel with its fit breakdown, subject and methodology alignment, scope, and publication information. A researcher can compare the reasoning behind different options without losing the shortlist. A dedicated Journal Match entry point leads into the account-based product.

Pricing follows the same emphasis on clarity. Essential, Professional and Expert are presented as different review depths, with a shared output format: a review report and an annotated Word manuscript. The comparison explains which checks belong to each level and how manuscript length affects the credit calculation.

The site supports English, Russian and Uzbek navigation, with clear routes to sign-in, registration, submission and pricing. Public examples let visitors explore the feedback format before creating an account. Across the experience, structured tables, expandable explanations and consistent calls to action turn a complex academic workflow into a sequence of understandable decisions. The result is a focused document product that connects manuscript feedback with the practical decisions around review and journal selection.