The controversial practice of mining in Australia is multifaceted, with a number of instrumental players being involved throughout its history. Mining is a process that operates in accordance with the guidance of many different priorities. Mining, on paper, should concern itself with not only the economic prowess of its owners and business associates, but also with the safety, morality, and legal guidelines of its jurisdiction. To ensure all parties are satisfied, mining companies must be open to communication, thorough in their enquiries, and effective in crisis prevention and management. Australia’s reliance on its exportation of minerals is clearly indicative of a need to please stakeholders. In 2019 alone, Australia exported $234 billion worth of minerals to foreign countries. This statistic is staggering as mining exportation accumulates to 60 percent of all exportation merchandise from Australia (Australian Government, Geoscience Australia, 2022). Australia would likely suffer economically if mining was handled more progressively, however, the importance of protecting its workers and the environment must be a priority. With 86 percent of Australia’s mining industry being foreign owned (Australian Institute of research, 2022), there is often a lack of direct concern from the corporations regarding the impacts that their mines have on Australia and its people. It is obvious that the workers in these mines are not treated to the fairest of conditions, meaning that intervention may be necessary to protect the rights and safety of said workers. Kieraen, Et, Al., (2014) found that, although 80 percent of surveyed miners believe that mining is necessary for Australian economic success, only 55 percent believed they were being treated fairly at work. The main criticisms identified included: lack of safety precautions, unfair compensation for their labour, and an over emphasis on protecting the profit of owners and corporate high-ups. Job dissatisfaction is typically associated with less production, and ultimately a reluctance for workers to do what is instructed of them (Ghazzawi, 2008). Ultimately, if the stakeholders do not operate in accordance with their workers, the mining industry could see an unprecedented decrease in workers, and therefore profit. Due to Australia’s reliance on its exportation of minerals, this could have major social effects for all Australians, who are already suffering with the chronic effects of the coronavirus (Fernandes, 2022). Australia is ill prepared to handle such a shift in society, meaning the issue must be resolved swiftly and efficiently. This highlights the importance of advocacy. All Australians, regardless of their employment should be concerned with the conditions that our miners face to protect our country’s prosperity. Big organisations must feel the impact from those who keep them running, in order to prevent a social crisis. Australia has seen the firsthand consequences of mistreating their workers, with declines in teaching, nursing, and policing throughout the country (Australian Government Institute of Health and Welfare, 2022). These issues have damaged the economic and social state of the country, prompting many agencies to make corrective actions. This issue must not become another ugly misstep in Australia’s history.