Request Tracking Workflow Audit & Redesign by Corinne JarrettRequest Tracking Workflow Audit & Redesign by Corinne Jarrett

Request Tracking Workflow Audit & Redesign

Corinne Jarrett

Corinne Jarrett

Request Tracking Workflow Audit & Redesign

Overview

While reviewing how incoming dealer and client requests were being handled, I identified gaps in visibility, ownership, and follow‑up that were causing delays and unnecessary back‑and‑forth. I rebuilt the workflow into a structured tracking system that made requests impossible to lose and dramatically improved accountability across teams.

The Challenge

Requests were coming in through multiple channels with no centralized tracking. This meant:
No clear ownership
No consistent follow‑up
No easy way for managers to see what was pending, in progress, or overdue
High risk of missed or delayed responses - Which was happening daily
The attached document highlights the issue clearly: “Systems like this help teams ensure requests are not lost and allow managers to quickly see the status of outstanding tasks.”
That visibility simply didn’t exist before.

What I Did

Broke down the full process from taking the order to loading the item for shipping
Identified where requests were getting stuck or disappearing
Designed a structured tracking table with fields for request date, client, type, owner, status, and follow‑up
Implemented ownership rules so every request had a clear “Assigned To”
Added follow‑up dates to prevent stalled communication
Created a repeatable workflow that teams could use daily without friction
The redesign directly aligned with the document’s key elements: organized requests by date and type, assigned ownership, status tracking, and follow‑up fields.

Tools Used

Excel, internal systems, workflow documentation, cross‑team alignment, Jira

Results

Eliminated lost or forgotten requests
Improved response times and reduced bottlenecks
Increased visibility for managers and cross‑functional teams
Strengthened accountability by making ownership explicit
Created a predictable, repeatable workflow that scaled with volume
The business impact matched the document’s summary: “This structure improves visibility across teams, ensures accountability for each request, and reduces the risk of missed follow-ups.”

Key Strengths Demonstrated

Operational clarity, workflow design, pattern recognition aka Predictive Spite, accountability building, process stabilization, and the ability to turn chaos into actual structure that works.
PDF Example:
This example demonstrates how incoming requests can be structured and tracked to improve visibility,ownership, and follow-up. Systems like this help teams ensure requests are not lost and allow managers toquickly see the status of outstanding tasks.Example Tracking TableRequest Date Client Request Type Assigned To Status Follow-Up Date3/01 Dealer A Fabric Consultation Sales Rep Pending 3/033/02 Dealer B Pricing Request Sales Rep Completed ‒3/02 Dealer C Dealer Application Marketing In Progress 3/05Key Design Elements• Organized requests by date and type• Assigned ownership to prevent lost requests• Status tracking to monitor progress• Follow-up fields to ensure timely responsesBusiness ImpactThis structure improves visibility across teams, ensures accountability for each request, and reduces the riskof missed follow-ups.
Like this project

Posted Jul 16, 2026

Audited and redesigned the request-tracking workflow to add ownership, status tracking, and follow-ups, eliminating lost requests and improving visibility and response times.

Likes

0

Views

2