Musclin related skeletal muscle adaptations and physical endurance is primarily driven by its synergistic relationship with ANP (3). Containing a region that is homologous to natriuretic peptides, musclin competes with ANP to bind to natriuretic peptide receptor 3 on myocytes, potentiating ANP’s activation of cGMP (4,5). However, Subbotina et al.’s measurements of ANP did not indicate significant differences, like other studies have (4,5), due to the limited volume of the terminal blood draw from the mice that cannot account for the high variability in circulating ANP. Although musclin is acutely associated with type IIb glycolytic muscle fibres, its ability to contribute to high cGMP levels stimulate mitochondrial biogenesis which improves the body’s oxidation capacity and VO2 max (3,6). As such, type I oxidative muscle fibres have been known to be more resistant to cancer-induced muscle atrophy than type II muscle fibres, and thus musclin infusions have been implicated in preventative measures or treatments for cancer cachexia (1,7). Musclin’s potentiation of ANP also has systematic effects of increasing cardiomyocyte contractility in the heart which mitigates the risks of heart failure in cancer cachexia patients, increasing its viability as a treatment for patients who are unable to perform aerobic exercise (1,8). Although the 2015 study mentions
musclin’s negative correlation with the Ca2+-Akt-FOXO1 signalling cascade, it does not contribute these findings to the discussion which limits its investigation on skeletal muscle adaptations (3). Since FOXO1 has been implicated in regulating insulin signalling, its negative relationship with musclin suggests increased musclin is a strong contributor to the type IIb muscle fibre’s lack of glucose uptake (9,10). As such, increased levels of musclin indicates higher insulin resistance (11). This implicates high levels of musclin in the pathogenesis of and as a potential biomarker for insulin-resistant type 2 diabetes mellitus (2,12).