Streamlining NFT Trading with a Multi-Wallet Minting App



what I did:

• Questionnaire & Interviews
• User Persona
• Wireframing
• UI Design
• User testing
• Prototyping



Background

When an NFT project is released, a lot of people want to buy (mint) it, especially when it is popular and highly anticipated. This makes it hard for people with average internet or who are new to buying NFTs to get one because so many people are trying to buy the NFT at the same time, and the project can sell out very quickly. So how might we aid NFT traders in being able to participate in NFT project mints and not miss out on opportunities?



Process

Although I was the sole designer of this project, I didn’t work alone, it was a strong team effort that included three skilled developers. We communicated and brainstormed throughout the entire process.

I began by analyzing three similar automated minting apps (Tokun, Fenix, and NFT Thunder) and discovered that none of them is supported for mobile devices. We considered changing our focus and decided to solve this problem with a mobile app, instead of our original plan to target desktop users but we needed to validate this.

An overview of the process I followed in this project is:

💡 Discovery (Research)

🔍 Defining (Analysing research, user personas)

🧠 Ideating (Brainstorming with the team, Userflow)

🎨 Visual Design (Wireframing, high fidelity design, prototyping)



Qualitative Research - User Interview

I conducted 5 user interviews with existing users of Tokun, NFT thunder and Fenix.

I asked open-ended questions that got the users to explain the pain points that they experience using these desktop minting apps. I got the following cumulative responses:

• I cannot use Tokun on multiple PCs so if I am not with my laptop, I could miss out on mint opportunities. The speed is also not the best, it is definitely not a long-term solution
• A few times I have had latency issues
• It’s on a discord server and I usually find it difficult to navigate because of too much information
• Fenix has a steep learning curve, I have to watch videos to understand how to navigate
• I have had a lot of failed mints with Fenix, and it works on the mobile web but I always have to remain in my browser till the mint is complete which is not practical.





Quantitative Research - Survey

I created a survey using close-ended questions to understand the pain point users experience and at what frequency they experience those pain points. I created the survey using Google forms and shared it across various NFT Discord & Reddit communities. I got a total response of 40 after 4 days of sharing. Kindly go through the results of the main questions in the survey below:



Research Summary

Based on the research, I gathered that the following below is true:

• About 62% of users utilize minting apps on desktops every time they want to mint an NFT
• A little more than 50% rate the user experience on desktop as average
• A user talked about missing previous NFT minting opportunities because he was not with a computer at that point in time
• Most users are keen on transaction speed & Easy wallet management
• Users want to encounter low complexity

User Persona

These personas were created based on users I have met, and I put them together to serve as a reminder to focus on addressing their pain points every step of the way.



Problem Statement

Following the qualitative and quantitative research conducted, I was able to gather that the ease at which users can set up and manage wallets to prepare for mints is a significant criterion they look out for in minting apps. Also, a major problem is complexity when setting up the mint task because a lot of blockchain parameters will be required and often times it gets confusing.

Proposed Solution

I believe the way to solve this user problem is to create a mobile app that can process mint transactions in the shortest timeframe for Lin and also presents the lowest level of complexity and difficulty for Ezra, especially in the aspect of wallet management and setting up the mint process.



Design

I spent a significant amount of time thinking of different ways to approach this in order to achieve a shallow learning curve with the whole app. I decided to focus on hierarchy, using friendly language(because NFT terms can be confusing to newbies) and making sure the user understands what is going on at every step of the way.

User flow:

I created a user flow to illustrate how a user would navigate setting up their wallets and minting an NFT



Wireframing and Visualization:



High Fidelity:

1. Homescreen that shows the user an overview of their current projects, their NFTs and market gas prices



2. Wallets management allows users to create, fund and manage as many wallets as possible



3. Projects screen where the user can create new tasks or edit current tasks



Testing & Improvements

I prototyped the screens after visual design and had a live testing session with 5 users over Zoom. Majorly what I was looking for from the testing was to discover if the designs are friendly enough and reflect what we are trying to solve. I asked the users to do the following:

• Sign into the app
• Setup wallets for minting
• Setup parameters for the NFT project they want to mint and approve

Based on their feedback, I continually iterated my design with a more user-friendly approach which resulted in the following significant improvements:

1. More optimized Homescreen



• Removed the Ethereum price indicator because users said it was irrelevant and I agree. Ethereum price is easily accessible everywhere and it would be better to indicate stats which is more relevant to the mint process, which is the Gas fees (gwei)
• Introduced project status to easily show the user what is going on with each mint

2. Added Project Status Indicator



• Added a colour-based indicator to each project card to show the status - Red meaning error, Green meaning Active and Grey meaning Idle

3. Simplified wallets page



• Based on user feedback that the initial screen was not too appealing to the eye visually, I tried to simplify the design and removed the big button in order to make it less colour heavy.
• Changed Distribute to Manage because users could not initially tell what the button does. Also added headers where relevant to break each element group so it is easier for users to understand



Final Screens

After a series of iterations based on user feedback, I arrived at the following final screens: Add something at the bottom about how the project is still improving and changes are being rolled out.

1. Better hierarchy & Language on the Homepage



• Based on mentor feedback, I moved the projects list to the top of the screen to give it higher priority over other elements. I thought this was a smart suggestion because the projects rank higher than Gas fees info in terms of importance to the user.
• Simplified the Projects & Gas Analytics section and removed colours on the headers, per user feedback that there were too many colours on the screen. I found that made this made it more digestible and less overwhelming.
• Revised the header language to make them easier to understand and added more detailed information to the projects list which I will go through in more detail next.

2. More detailed & functional projects list



• Based on user feedback, the colour indicators on the side of each task card to show the task status were not too easy to understand. I improved the design to show the project status and task status in more detail using text, icons and colours allowing the user to view all of this information at a single glance.
• For situations where there are only a few failed tasks while other tasks in the project are running fine, the user attention can be called to that without having to mark the entire project as an error.

3. Simplified the process of creating projects



• Based on user feedback, filling in required smart contract parameters on one screen was better than breaking the process into bits, they preferred doing it at once rather than having to click on ‘next’ to fill another section before finalizing
• "Initially split process to reduce clutter and overload, but most users wanted to edit errors and double-check parameters without navigating two screens. Some just wanted to create a project in one click and as a result, I narrowed it down to one screen.

Reflections & Learnings

A few things I took from this project:

1. Iterate as needed: I shouldn’t just create a design and then move on. Instead, I should be constantly iterating on my designs based on feedback from users. This could involve making small tweaks to my design or making significant changes based on what I learn from user feedback.
2. Prioritize insights and feedback from users: Users are the ones who will ultimately be using the product, so it's important to prioritize their thoughts and put them first.
3. It's easy to make assumptions about what users want or need, but it's important to validate these assumptions through research and not just dive into Figma to design whatever I think the solution might be.