2Food apartheid has replaced the term ‘food desert’ in recent years, and is defined as areas empty of good-quality, affordable fresh food
(Brones, 2018).
3
can help us begin to break down systems that disproportionately incarcerate Black and brown
communities and deny them healthy foods.
My research questions are important because the results may prove that areas of food
apartheid and redlining are connected to crime and policing. A plethora of research has found
that food apartheid areas and formerly redlined neighborhoods have a direct link to health
deficits and are already a public health issue. Learning that they may also be a contributing factor
to high levels of crime and unjust policing would further prove that food apartheid must be
addressed in order to abolish prisons and that neighborhoods that were redlined in the past
should be provided with resources equal to their non-redlined counterparts.
These questions are important to the field of urban strategy because the answers might
prove that cities must invest more time, money, and energy into making healthy foods available
in all neighborhoods. The data could also show that there is a disproportionate rate of policing in
food apartheid areas, while the resources used for said policing could instead be implemented in
providing healthy foods.
Existing literature that I explored relative to my topic are articles and books that focus
primarily on incarceration, abolition, and food. Many articles explore the relationship between
food scarcity and the carceral justice system. Others explore the role of community and urban
gardens in feeding impoverished neighborhoods. Some examine the role that agriculture and the
current day plantation play in the disproportionate incarceration of Black Americans.
My research methods included gathering data and information from existing literature
and from conducting interviews with experts in the field. These experts included professors who
have researched food scarcity, Philadelphians who are working to provide healthy food to all
residents, and authors who have written on the topics. I believe these are appropriate because
4
they all provided data and research as it pertains to my research questions. They also informed
whether these links have been observed in the past, by who, and where.
Research Methods and Protocols My thesis examines and evaluates whether there is a link between food insecurity and the
carceral justice system. My qualitative research consisted of interviewing and conversing with
experts in the field who have done similar research.
My research subjects are as follows:
● Mariana Chilton, Director of the Dornsife School’s Center for Hunger Free
Communities.
● Joshua Sbicca, food justice expert and author of Food Justice Now.
● Nyssa Entrekin, Associate Director of the Healthy Corner Store Initiative at The
Food Trust
● Wayne Williams, Program Manager of Community Based Programming at The
Food Trust
● Janice Tosto, Hunger Relief Supervisor at Bebashi
● Ashley Gripper, Founder of Land Based Jawns
● Katherine Alaimo, Associate Professor, Director, Sustainable Agriculture and
Food Systems Minor and Specialization at Michigan State University
● Matt Stebins and Kaelee Shepherd, Community organizers for the Coral Street
Fridge
● Sonia Parikh, Co-Founder of The People’s Fridge
● Nicholas Freudenberg, Senior Faculty Fellow at the CUNY Urban Food Policy
Institute
5
● Ashley Gurvitz, CEO at The Alliance for Northeast Unification
● Alison Alkon, Co-editor of Cultivating Food Justice
● Kanav Kathuria, Founder of the Maryland Food and Prison Abolition Project
All my subjects received the proper IRB form, as well as being notified that our
conversations were recorded. Since they are experts in their fields, I used their real names-
however I protected the confidentiality of anyone they talk about. Since this research focuses
heavily on people who are targeted by the carceral justice system, I feel strongly that their names
should be protected.
The interview questions that guided my conversations with my research subjects can be
found in Appendix A.
Expected Findings I hypothesize that I will find a link between food scarcity and the carceral justice system.
If not a correlation or causation, a relationship. According to research I have already done, food
insecurity can lead to increased crime and violence rates. I predict that as a person’s relationship
(and access) to healthy food changes, so too does their relationship to the justice system,
redlining, and poverty.
Limitations My limitations in the paper are that I will only be focusing on Philadelphia, because my
goal is to propose policies that will help the city I know best. I will not be able to speak to
formerly, or currently, incarcerated people, due to the sensitive nature of seeking them out. I
believe my research would be bettered by learning firsthand the relationship that formerly
incarcerated people have with food, but I have few ways of achieving that. I cannot research
neighborhoods with high rates of formerly incarcerated residents, due to a lack of data. There is
also limited data on policing rates in neighborhoods of food apartheid and food swamps. There is
6
a plethora of data on where crimes occur most, but none on where police target residents the
most- regardless of whether or not crimes are committed. Additionally, I am limited in
suggesting that there is a causal link between food access and incarceration rates. While a
person’s relationship to food might impact their relationship to the carceral justice system, it will
be difficult to prove that there is a direct causation between the two.
7
Chapter 2: Literature Review
Introduction For abolitionists, the end of police and prisons is an overarching goal to achieve freedom.
However, many experts and activists recognize that abolishing these systems will not occur in a
vacuum. In the United States, policing and prisons were created to criminalize Black and brown
communities, as just one of the ways they experience everyday violence at the hands of the state.
Many experts and historians have argued that policing and prisons are simply an extension of the
slave state. Kica Matos and Jamila Hodge write that:
Because the 13th Amendment3 exempted people convicted of crimes, the criminal legal
system has been used to extract labor from enslaved people’s descendants. Immediately
after the abolition of slavery, Black codes4 criminalized activities like selling crops
without permission from a white person. Other laws criminalized Black people for being
too close to a white person in public, walking “without purpose,” walking next to railroad
tracks, or assembling after dark (2021).
Slavery’s lasting legacy can be found in today’s police and prison forces because policing and
prisons were first created in the United States to uphold slavery. Further examples of systemic
violence against Black and brown people can be found in the built environment5, gentrification6,
redlining, and more. All of these violent policies and practices are couched and rooted in racism.
A lack of access to healthy foods is one such example of this violence. Food access, or
lack thereof, lives at the intersection of the built environment, redlining, gentrification, and
3The 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for
crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction" (National Archives, 2022).
4After the Civil War ended in 1865, some states passed black codes that severely limited the rights of Black people, many of whom had been
enslaved. (National Geographic, 2022)
5 The built environment can generally be described as the man-made or modified structures that provide people with living, working, and
recreational spaces. (EPA, 2022) 6Gentrification is a process in which a poor area (as of a city) experiences an influx of middle-class or wealthy people who renovate and rebuild
homes and businesses and which often results in an increase in property values and the displacement of earlier, usually poorer residents. (Merriam Webster)
8
policing. My thesis will demonstrate these dynamics in action. Ashante Reese, an expert in the
field of food justice, food sovereignty, and racism in the food systems, writes that: “Abolitionist
theory…makes connections between how power that is concentrated in police forces and prisons
flows into other parts of our lives through channels such as the food system” (Reese, 2020).
In the rest of this literature review, I will focus on topics such as food apartheid and food
swamps, and the role that corner stores play in healthy food access. I will explain the history of
redlining and how it has shaped the environments that Black and poor people live in. I will also
explore the links between incarceration and the food system and describe the food justice and
food sovereignty movements and their roles in food access. Lastly, I will discuss urban gardening
and agriculture, and how they increase access to healthy foods while also providing at-risk youth
with opportunities that help them avoid the criminal justice system. I will describe these and
more in this review of contemporary and foundational literature.
Food Apartheid, Food Swamps, and Corner Stores Food apartheid, otherwise known as food deserts, describes a neighborhood or area that
does not have any good quality or affordable fresh food retailers. The term ‘food desert’ was first
introduced in 1995, in a British report on malnutrition. It was first used to describe a public
housing development whose residents had poor access to nutritious foods (Rogers, 2023). A few
years later, when it gained prominence in the United States, it became widely understood as a
primary reason for high diabetes and obesity rates (Kolb, 2022, 1). The concept became so
popular, in fact, that it grew from a fledgling idea to a source for major federal programs within
just two decades (Kolb, 2022, 1). By 2014, the term food desert was mostly often applied urban
areas with high percentages of Black residents, particularly in Detroit and Philadelphia (Kolb,
2022, 6).
9
In recent years, food activist Karen Washington coined the term food apartheid, to replace
food desert. She argues that while deserts are natural and organic, food deserts are not. They are
a direct result of the racist food system in the US (Lakhani, 2021). For the purposes of this paper,
I will be using the term food apartheid as opposed to food desert, because I too believe that the
system of food distribution is intentionally and systematically prejudiced.
In recent years, numerous policies have been drafted and proposed in an effort to
‘eliminate’ food apartheid. For example, in February of 2021, U.S. Senator Mark R. Warner (D-
VA), along with Senators Jerry Moran (R-KS), Bob Casey (D-PA), and Shelley Moore Capito
(R-WV), introduced the Healthy Food Access for All Americans (HFAAA) Act. The legislation
aimed to expand access to affordable and nutritious food in areas designated as food apartheid
areas (Warner, 2021). As of June 2023, the act has not passed.
There is prior research on crimes and food apartheid areas; one report claims that every
one percent increase in food insecurity leads to an approximately 12 percent increase in violent
crime (Caughron, 2016). There is also a plethora of research on disadvantaged communities and
incarceration. For example, one report claims that asthma rates were higher in New York City
neighborhoods with higher incarceration rates (Gifford, 2019). I aim to explore whether or not
neighborhoods with a lack of food access also have higher incarceration rates. There is already
vast research on the health impacts of neighborhood food access, such as cardiovascular health
and diet related diseases.
Relevant to food apartheid neighborhoods are also food swamp neighborhoods. Food
swamps describe an area where corner stores with unhealthy food items and fast-food
establishments are more prevalent than stores that provide healthy foods (CDC). Research in the
U.S found that food swamps actually have a higher impact on obesity and diabetes rates than
10
food apartheid areas (Daghigh, 2019). Research has found that low-income and minority
populations are far likelier to live in food swamps than their white counterparts, and it has
adverse effects on their health (Cooksey-Stowers et al., 2017). In fact, a report found that fast
food restaurants are more likely to open in neighborhoods with high concentrations of non-white
residents. This proves the relationship between race, class, and food environments, with one
report stating that “These associations raise questions about causality and suggest that the race
and ethnicity of a community shapes the actions of the food industry and community design
decision makers, which in turn, influence the food environment” (Cooksey-Stowers et al., 2017).
Redlining and Disinvestment The term "redlining" comes from the development by the federal government of maps of
every metropolitan area in the country during the New Deal. Those maps were color-coded by
first the Home Owners Loan Corp., then the Federal Housing Administration, then adopted by
the Veterans Administration, and these color codes were designed to indicate where it was “safe”
to insure mortgages. Anywhere where African Americans lived, anywhere where African
Americans lived nearby, were colored red to indicate to appraisers that these neighborhoods were
too risky to insure mortgages (Gross, 2017).
African American residents in red colored areas were rejected for mortgages and credit
from banks. Over time, their neighborhoods became the most disinvested in (Blumgart, 2017).
Redlining is how segregation has been built into our neighborhoods and cities intentionally. The
Color of Law, a seminal book on the topic, states that
Today’s racial segregation in the North, South, Midwest, and West is not the unintended
consequence of individual choices and of otherwise well-meaning law or regulation but
of unhidden public policy that explicitly segregated every metropolitan area in the United
States. [Redlining] was so systematic and forceful that its effects endure to the present
time (Rothstein, 2017).
11
The Homeowners’ Loan Corporation mapped over two-hundred cities across the United States
(Adkins, 2021). Poor, immigrant, and Black communities were the most heavily impacted by the
system. Across the US, neighborhoods with large swaths of African American residents saw their
communities lose access to resources and mortgage lending that went instead to their white
counterparts. As seen in Figure 1, many Northeastern states where African Americans had
escaped to post-slavery were the most heavily redlined.
Figure 1. Redlining across the United States Source: Adkins, 2021
Redlining and segregation have also played a role in the current system of mass
incarceration in the United States. The long-term disinvestment in schools and education led to
high dropout rates and less job opportunities in Black neighborhoods, incentivizing crime for
many Black men (Waterman, 2016). Additionally, the infamous War on Drugs in the US in the
1980’s intentionally targeted poor Black Americans in low-income, inner-city neighborhoods.
12
Many of these neighborhoods had a previous history of redlining (Wingfield, 2022). This
intersection of drugs, incarceration, and poverty has had a lasting impact on African American
communities:
The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 and 1988 established mandatory minimum sentences
which largely targeted communities of color. Five-year mandatory minimums were
placed for first-time possession of five grams of crack cocaine, compared to a five-year
mandatory minimum for first-time possession of five hundred grams of powder cocaine.
Crack cocaine was more common in low-income, inner-city neighborhoods, often
communities of color, whereas powder cocaine was more expensive and associated with
whites. As a result of these disparities in sentencing for crack versus powder cocaine, the
criminal justice system was racialized. A link was made between the Black community,
drugs, and crime that would be cemented in American rhetoric, policy, and systems of
law enforcement for years to come (Wingfield, 2022).
Residents of historically redlined areas are subject to increased rates of gunshot-related ED visits
and injuries, increased odds of preterm birth, and higher rates of diabetes specific mortality and
years of life lost (Egede et al., 2023). Redlined neighborhoods also have higher rates of violent
crime, as shown in Figure 2.
13
Figure 2. Violent crime rates in redlined neighborhoods. Source: Townsley et al., 2021
Redlining and food apartheid are linked in a phenomenon called supermarket redlining.
Supermarket redlining is when major chain supermarkets are disinclined to locate their stores in
inner cities or low-income neighborhoods and usually pull their existing stores out and relocate
them to suburbs (Zhang and Debarchana, 2015). In the 1990s, many supermarkets fled urban
neighborhoods in a process similar to White Flight7. Urban planner Julian Agyeman writes that
There is a cultural bias among large retailers against putting outlets in minority-populated
areas. Speaking about why supermarkets were fleeing the New York borough of Queens
in the 1990s, the city’s then-Consumer Affairs Commissioner Mark Green put it this way:
“First they may fear that they do not understand the minority market. But second is their
knee-jerk premise that Blacks are poor, and poor people are a poor market” (Agyeman,
2021).
7A term that originated in the United States, starting in the mid-20th century, and applied to the large-scale migration of people of various
European ancestries from racially mixed urban regions to more racially homogeneous suburban or exurban regions.
14
It is important to remember that these communities were made poor intentionally by redlining
and the disinvestment that followed. The wealth gap was created by redlining.
Another result of decades long redlining and disinvestment is gentrification. Redlining
has devalued real estate in inner cities so much that it has now become profitable for investors to
come in and start making money by purchasing properties at low cost, tearing them down and
building higher priced homes (World Food Policy Center). After decades of disinvestment that
resulted in poor food access, education quality, and greenery, gentrification shows that when
neighborhoods are populated with low-income Black and brown residents, they are perceived as
not worth investing in. Only once white middle class residents move in does investment flow.
Incarceration and Food Access Prisons and policing have roots in slavery and plantation ideology. Plantations have long
been abolished, but their remnants can be seen today in the targeting of Black people by the
police (Reese and Sbicca, 2022). Not only has the carceral state shaped Black communities'
relationship with the food system since slavery, now the food system is also reinforcing the
relationship to incarceration and the carceral state. When discussing the abolition of police and
prisons, we must also discuss the need to abolish unhealthy food systems (Reese, 2020a).
A primary example of the relationship between food access and incarceration and
recidivism is the Farm Bill. Amendments to the bill have repeatedly completely cut access to
food stamps, known as SNAP, for people who have been convicted of violent crimes (Cooper,
2013). These cuts to SNAP make it nearly impossible for formerly incarcerated people to provide
for their families, leading to high recidivism rates when they return to ways they made money
prior to being incarcerated, which in many cases could be the reasons they were incarcerated.
More than 630,000 people are released from prison annually, with forty-three percent of that
population returning to prison within the first year (Francois, 2018). Cutting access to food
15
stamps is one way to throw people back into prisons or other dangerous situations to make
money.
Along with losing access to SNAP, people who have previously been incarcerated are
more likely to live in food swamps and food apartheid areas (Testa, 2018). Not only does this
increase the likelihood of going into dangerous situations to make money, but it also exacerbates
health disparities in formerly incarcerated people (Testa, 2018). The United States’ history of
mass incarceration has led to wide health disparities targeting Black and brown people. These
disparities can be linked to poverty, poor employment, unstable housing, and of course, food
insecurity (Dong and Feng, 2021).
The families of incarcerated people are also impacted by unjust food systems. The
economic losses caused by incarceration can impact any children involved and can shape their
relationship to healthy food for the remainder of their lives (Gifford, 2019). One study found that
a parent’s involvement with the criminal justice system can be linked to the entire family’s risk
of food insecurity (Santos et al., 2022). Unlike adults, children are not able to travel to areas
outside their neighborhood for different food options. A lack of access to healthy food has also
been linked to low test scores in children from low-income backgrounds (Rowe, 2022).
Incarceration, food apartheid, and food insecurity have countless impacts on children and
families.
Food Access, Incarceration, and Health When discussing communities that are at high risk for diet related diseases, it is important
to note that they were made that way intentionally. Mariana Chilton states that “they are not
‘unhealthy communities.’ They were made unhealthy. They are minoritized communities. They
are discriminated against communities. And that's policy. Over multiple generations, over many
years, hundreds of years in the making. Communities are made unhealthy by the policies that are
16
put into place” (Chilton, 2022). The health of residents living under food apartheid also plays a
vital role in their life expectancy, relationship to incarceration, and their overall well-being in
neighborhoods that were designed against them.
The greatest killer of Black Americans in the United States is not violence but diet related
diseases. Multiple factors coincide to make this a reality: poverty, unclean air and water,
stressors, and of course unhealthy foods. Additionally, studies have found that other factors that
disproportionately impact Black Americans can also lead to a high-risk factor for diet related
diseases (Olokotun et al., 2022). According to one study,
There is strong evidence linking heart disease to socioeconomic status, drug use, cigarette
smoking, unemployment, and stress. In addition to these factors, incarceration has also
emerged as a variable of interest that may be associated with chronic health conditions
such as heart disease. Evidence shows that individuals who are currently incarcerated
have a higher burden of heart disease compared to individuals in the general population,
raising concerns about the relationship between exposure to incarceration and heart
health (Olokotun et al., 2022).
Studies also report that having an incarcerated family member can have an adverse effect
on health. Even if an individual has not been incarcerated themselves, studies show that women
with incarcerated partners are at higher risk for depression, diabetes, and hypertension compared
to those with non-incarcerated partners (Widra, 2021). Additionally, children whose parents are
incarcerated have higher rates of mental health problems and substance use disorders (Widra,
2021). All of these factors impact Black Americans at higher rates than their white counterparts,
and all can lead to lower life expectancy. As shown in Figures 3 and 4, incarceration does not
only impact those who are incarcerated, but their families as well.
17
Figure 3. The Physical and Mental Health of People with Incarcerated Family Members. Source: Prison Policy Initiative
18
Figure 4. Rates of Incarcerated Family Members by Race. Source: Prison Policy Initiative
Living under food apartheid has a notable impact on an individual’s health and well-
being. Among low-income families in food apartheid areas, low access to healthy foods
contributes to poor nutrition and can lead to higher rates of obesity (Meeks and Alexis, 2021).
Additionally, Black Americans, who are also more likely to live in food apartheid areas, have the
highest rates of diet related diseases such as diabetes and hypertension (Meeks and Alexis, 2021).
As always, redlining also plays a role. In a new study conducted by the Journal of the
American College of Cardiology, researchers found that as neighborhoods' redlining grade
decreased, the rates of diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and smoking increased (Rodriguez, 2022).
Further, researchers found that while health insurance can help people with diet related diseases
manage their illnesses, nearly twice the number of adults did not have health insurance in D-
graded areas compared to residents in A-graded neighborhoods. This proves the association
between redlining and health outcomes. (Rodriguez, 2022).
It is clear that food access, redlining, and incarceration can all have adverse effects on a
person’s health, even if the person themselves is not incarcerated. The fact that a family
member’s incarceration can negatively impact someone’s cardiovascular health is evidence that
incarceration has far reaching consequences beyond keeping one person in prison. Above that, if
a person has lived under food apartheid and other impacts of redlining their entire lives and is
later incarcerated, the odds are invariably stacked against them, health wise. Not only do redlined
and food apartheid neighborhoods offer meek healthy food options, but so too do prisons.
Unfortunately, Black and poor Americans are most likely to live under all of these conditions,
and their health is most likely to suffer the most as a result. Food is arguably the most critical
19
‘thing that promotes health’, and in urban areas food choice is often severely constrained
(Eisenhauer, 2001).
Food Sovereignty and Food Justice Food sovereignty is defined as the right of those who grow food to create their own food
and agriculture systems, as well as maintain access to healthy foods (La Via Campesina, 2018).
In urban areas of food apartheid, food sovereignty is seen as a solution. La Via Campesina, the
organization responsible for launching the concept of food sovereignty in 1996, says that:
Food Sovereignty is about systemic change – about human beings having direct,
democratic control over the most important elements of their society – how we feed and
nourish ourselves, how we use and maintain the land, water, and other resources around
us for the benefit of current and future generations, and how we interact with other
groups, peoples, and cultures (La Via Campesina, 2018).
The current food system we live under proves a need for food sovereignty, which first gained
momentum in the Global South, where global food corporations have exploited the livelihoods of
small and local farmers for years (Alkon and Agyeman, 2011). Experts have argued that food
sovereignty is the first step to food security, which many low-income communities have been
fighting for. Demands for global food sovereignty are largely anti-imperialist and anti-capitalist,
and seek to create food systems that are sustainable, equitable, and healthy (Holt Gimenez and
Shattuck, 2011).
Urban agriculture can be a method by which people living in food apartheid areas achieve
food sovereignty (Colson-Fearon and Versey, 2022). According to a study done in Baltimore,
participants of a neighborhood urban garden noted that if supported, urban agriculture could: (1)
address food access inequality; (2) support community empowerment; (3) encourage health
promotion; and (4) provide sustainable access to healthy food (Colson-Fearon and Versey, 2022).
While food sovereignty began as a mechanism to support farmers in the Global South, it has
become a means for Black Americans living under food apartheid to combat food insecurity.
20
Race plays a pivotal role in the food sovereignty movement. America’s history of food
and agriculture is so entrenched in racist codes and policies, that it is impossible to discuss, and
more importantly achieve, food sovereignty without addressing race explicitly (Cooper, 2018).
Not only was American land first stolen from Indigenous people, but that land was then
maintained by enslaved African Americans, who later were denied the opportunity to purchase
their own land, and even later were used as labor again through the prison system (Roots of
Change, 2022). The history of food growth and farming in the United States is couched in racism
and anti-Blackness. Many food sovereignty and food justice activists have argued that America’s
racist food systems have in fact contributed to inequitable access to healthy food (Alkon and
Mares, 2012). As seen in the six pillars of food sovereignty below, food sovereignty values food
providers- especially Black and brown people who have been forced to grow food for the
wealthy and struggled in the process.
21
22
Figure 5. The Six Pillars of Food Sovereignty. Source: La Via Campesina, 2018.
The food justice movement has been vital in the United States over the past several years.
Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, hunger rates increased—as did a need for food
justice. According to the organization Feeding America, most Americans who were most
impacted by the pandemic were food insecure or at risk of food insecurity prior to COVID-19
and are now facing even greater hardship since COVID-19 (Feeding America, 2021). In response
to rising hunger, unemployment, disrupted supply chains, and unaffordable food costs, the food
justice movement became more popular throughout the country. Many community fridges and
pantries were opened as a response to the pandemic, including the West Philadelphia People’s
Fridge. Community gardens also became more popular as a result.
23
Food justice activists use food as a tool for social justice (Sbicca, 2018). While food
security and access have been a part of the larger conversation on food for many years, food
justice brings to light the fact that low-income and impoverished communities are often erased
from the narrative, and in fact are the most harmed by the current food system (Alkon and
Agyeman, 2011). These communities are erased from the narrative due in part to the racism that
keeps them from being able to achieve food sovereignty. Food justice activists also argue that,
due to racist federal policies such as redlining and land theft, Black and brown communities are
completely excluded from the US food system (Alkon and Mares, 2012). These same
communities lack local access to healthy foods, and the healthy foods that they do have physical
access to are often outside their price range (Winne, 2009).
Leah Penniman, a scholar-activist, and farmer, frequently writes about liberation theology
in farming. Liberation theology generally refers to a theology applied to the core concerns of
marginalized communities in need of social, political, or economic equality and justice (B.
Bradley, 2016). It is a vital tenet of food justice and the need for food sovereignty. Penniman and
other Black farmers are working to increase equity and access in agriculture. Research has found
that Black people working in the food system earn less wages than their white counterparts,
receive less benefits, and live with less access to healthy food (Penniman, 2018, 8). Creating an
anti-racist and anti-carceral framework within farming is more than necessary. Food can be a
way to examine the prison system by exploring the role that the plantation plays in food and
nutrition (Reese and Sbicca, 2022).
Urban Gardening and Agriculture Urban gardens have provided produce and nutrition to many since World War II. During
the war, ‘victory gardens’ began being planted around the country. These gardens were providing
24
the only produce that many households could get at the time, due to the low supply of consumer
goods (Hall, 2020). In the present day, urban farms are still a source of nutrition and produce in
food apartheid areas and food swamps. In places like West Philadelphia, many community
members have grown and maintained gardens as a way to combat food insecurity. Urban farms
and gardens can improve food security by providing fresh and renewable access to grains, nuts,
fruits, and vegetables (Krishnan et al., 2016).
Not only does gardening increase access to healthy foods, but it can also help build
community and prevent violence. In North Carolina, a community came together to build a
garden on the land of an abandoned prison. The project aimed to help keep young men out of
prison, and the organizers found that over the years of 2011 to 2016, of the twenty-four youth
who were involved, the garden was 92 percent effective in preventing incarceration and
recidivism (Cooke, 2020).
For incarcerated members of society, gardening has become a rehabilitation device
(Chennault and Sbicca, 2022). In the United States, at least 662 adult prisons have gardening and
farming activities, the stated purpose of which are rehabilitative, financial, and reparative
(Chennault and Sbicca, 2022). However, many scholars and experts argue that the system of
agriculture in prisons is as exploitative and harmful as it is rehabilitative (Hazelett, 2021). Due to
the violent history of slave labor and agriculture in the United States, it is arguable that prison
agriculture is an extension of this history (Chennault and Sbicca, 2022). Additionally, prison
agriculture is part of a campaign of green prison reforms that do not acknowledge or challenge
the need to abolish the prison system entirely (Hazelett, 2021).
The history of food growth and food systems in the United States is built on systems of
racism and oppression. Black Americans were brought to the US as slaves to grow food, but once
25
slavery was abolished, they too were forced out of farmlands. Over the course of the last century,
Black American farmers have lost a total of 12 million acres of farmland, due in large part to
racist federal policies like redlining, and inequitable social practices (Meredith, 2022). In recent
years, Black Americans have worked to remake these harmful systems, and take back their land.
In 2010, food activist Karen Washington began the annual National Black Farmers and Urban
Gardeners Conference, which brings together over five-hundred Black farmers (Penniman, 2018,
3).
Conclusion A plethora of research suggests the links between food access, incarceration, and health.
Black and brown people in the United States fight different injustices daily, and access to food is
just one piece of the puzzle. Of all the violence these communities face, the biggest killer of
Black Americans is not gun-related violence, but diet related diseases. These diseases impact
low-income and Black communities at higher rates, in part due to their proximity to food
apartheid, food insecurity, and food swamps (Penniman, 2021). The entire system is working in
tandem to target Black Americans.
In my research, I aim to fill the gaps left by scholars. Where past literature has examined
formerly incarcerated peoples’ lack of access to healthy food, I want to explore the relationship
between a lack of access to healthy food and future incarceration rates. I will apply this
foundational literature to a case study of Philadelphia to examine the ways that redlining and
food apartheid can be linked to incarceration. Ultimately, it is my hope that my research can start
to build a pathway for healthier communities that can help shape an abolitionist future.
26
Chapter 3: Planning Discrimination: How Redlining Shaped Food
Apartheid in Philadelphia
Redlining and Food
8
Figure 6. A Redlining Map of Philadelphia. Source: National Archives and Records Administration via UrbanOasis.org
Philadelphia has always been a ‘free’ city and was in fact a destination for many runaway
slaves escaping the South (Waterman, 2016). In Philadelphia, many Black families were able to
rebuild their lives and shape new communities away from the oppressive Jim Crow laws of the
8Redlining maps classified neighborhoods in 4 categories: A – “Best” areas, colored green; B – “Desirable” areas, colored blue; C – “Declining”
areas, colored yellow; D – “Hazardous” areas, colored red.
27
South. However, systemic racism followed them. Despite being free, the North had racism of its
own (Waterman, 2016). In the 1930s, the system of redlining began in Philadelphia and
elsewhere in the United States. A map of the way Philadelphia was redlined can be seen above in
Figure 6. Although the Fair Housing Act of 1968 was passed to fight redlining, its impacts are
still felt today. Today, Philadelphia neighborhoods that were redlined in the 1930s have the
highest rates of gun violence, poor education, food apartheid, heat islands, and unclean air
(Ackley, 2020; Jaramillo, 2020; Li and Yuan, 2022; Palmer et al., 2021 Rhynhart, 2020). All of
these factors work in tandem to create neighborhoods where low-income Black and brown
people live in poor health, and the built environment in Philadelphia intentionally made these
neighborhoods poor and unhealthy. Food justice author and organizer Alison Alkon tells me that
because of redlining, “you'll find relationships if you look at incarceration rates by zip code and
you map them onto areas of food apartheid. They're going to line up with poor education systems
and every marker of marginalization that we see” (Alkon, 2023).
With less access to food, Black people in redlined neighborhoods are more likely to steal
it (Rangel, 2020). This leads to more encounters with police and the carceral justice system.
Kanav Kathuria, who has extensively researched the links between incarceration and food for the
Maryland Food and Prison Abolition Project, says that “the same neighborhoods that were
subject to historic oppression are bearing the brunt of food apartheid right now, and they are
hyper incarcerated” (Kathuria, 2023).
Supermarket redlining has been a large issue in Philadelphia, so much so that in 2004, a
statewide financing program called The Pennsylvania Fresh Food Financing Initiative (FFFI)
began in order to build supermarkets and grocery stores in minority urban and rural
neighborhoods (Reinvestment Fund). FFFI ran from 2004 to 2010 and ended because the limited
28
funds had run out. The aim of the program was to remove financing obstacles and lower
operating barriers for supermarkets in poor communities; reduce the high incidence of diet-
related diseases by providing healthy food; and stimulate investment of private capital in low-
wealth communities (Reinvestment Fund). According to the Reinvestment Fund, a partner in the
project, “FFFI attracted 206 applications from across Pennsylvania, with 88 projects financed as
of June 2010. In total, more than $73.2 million in loans and $12.1 million in grants were
approved. Projects approved for financing were expected to bring 5,023 jobs and 1.67 million
square feet of commercial space.” This project was able to provide supermarkets to many
neighborhoods in need, but unfortunately did not have enough funding to continue past 2010.
Redlining, food access, and health also intersect in myriad ways. Research has found that
diet and cardiovascular related diseases disproportionately impact people who live in both
redlined and food apartheid neighborhoods (Mujahid et al., 2021). A study on the links between
redlining and cardiovascular health found that redlining has a lasting impact on cardiovascular
risk for Black Americans (Mujahid et al., 2021). The report on the study states that: “...similar to
the institution of slavery, redlining is one manifestation of structural racism that drives health
outcomes today. This work underscores the necessity to investigate structural racism as a root
cause of racial/ethnic health inequities” (Mujahid et al., 2021).
While the relationship between cardiovascular health and redlining are vastly
understudied, the authors of the report did find links, including the way that redlining has played
a role in segregation, poverty, and low-income levels—all of which have previously been linked
to negative cardiovascular health (Mujahid et al., 2021).
It is clear that redlined neighborhoods are disinvested in and this impacts residents on
multiple different levels. The drug war, education, public health, and food access are all ways in
29
which redlined neighborhoods are disadvantaged as compared to their non-redlined counterparts.
While it is difficult to map out a direct causation between redlined neighborhoods, food, and
incarceration, it is clear that redlined neighborhoods suffer from public health detriments in
many ways- all that are linked to the carceral justice state. We cannot discuss the ways that
redlining and food access and incarceration have impacted neighborhoods without taking a step
back and seeing how the three are linked.
Food Apartheid + Food Swamps Not only does low access to food indirectly lead to interactions with the criminal justice
system, but redlined neighborhoods are also likelier to also live under food apartheid. Ashley
Gurvitz tells me that in many cities, “certain neighborhoods have better outcomes around food,
and certain neighborhoods do not, and it's another transformative form of redlining, just to keep
people behind” (Gurvitz, 2023).
The violence of redlining, food apartheid, and incarceration are all linked in their purpose
to keep Black people and neighborhoods unhealthy. In fact, Kanav Kathuria says that “prisons
and food apartheid are really two formations that stem from the same core of racial capitalism
and premature death being the outcome of both of them” (Kathuria, 2023). The violence of food
apartheid is exactly why the term has replaced ‘food desert’ in recent years. Ashley Gurvitz is
clear about her definition of the term, telling me that “I’m not afraid to say it's apartheid, because
there are so many oppressive structures in place with it” (Gurvitz, 2023). The way apartheid
systemically works to oppress people of lower social mobility makes it the perfect descriptor for
how food access is mapped out in neighborhoods.
Many Philadelphia neighborhoods can be described as food swamps. A majority of the
city’s food stores sell only unhealthy foods, and the density of these stores increases as the
neighborhood income decreases (City of Philadelphia, 2019). Further, across Philadelphia, the
30
number of stores selling unhealthy foods outnumbers the number of stores selling healthy foods
by nearly 10 to 1 (City of Philadelphia, 2019). Figure 7 depicts how the majority of food retailers
in Philadelphia are corner stores, chain convenience stores, and gas stations.
Figure 7. Philadelphia Food Retailers. Source: Neighborhood Food Retail in Philadelphia, 2019
Neighborhoods that have a history of disinvestment and poverty are not just losing access to
healthy foods, but also have disproportionate access to foods that can lead to health issues and
illnesses. Figure 8 shows the amount of low-produce supply stores around Philadelphia, of which
corner stores are many.
31
Figure 8. Number of Low-Produce Supply Stores, Philadelphia. Source: Neighborhood Food Retail in Philadelphia
Figure 6
32
As figure 6 shows, in comparison with figure 8, neighborhoods that had lower HOLC
classifications in 1937 now have higher concentrations of low-produce supply stores, also known
as corner stores and mini markets. South Philadelphia had especially low redlining grades, and
now has especially high numbers of corner stores.
According to experts, adults over 50 who live in food swamps had a higher risk of stroke
compared to those who do not (Yang, 2023). Additionally, adults with diabetes who live in severe
food swamp areas had higher hospitalization rates (Phillips and Rodriguez, 2019). It is believed
that the availability of healthy vs. unhealthy foods can influence dietary outcomes, meaning that
living in a food swamp can impact a person’s likelihood of developing diabetes or other diet
related diseases and making them more vulnerable and prone to diabetes. (Phillips and
Rodriguez, 2019). According to an article about supermarket redlining and health, poor and
Black communities have the odds stacked against them and their long-term health in various
different ways, including low access to healthy foods: “Health hazards can always be either
exacerbated or ameliorated by social conditions, and the low status and diminished opportunities
that the urban poor experience aggravate the simple facts of low income and few food sources.”
(Eisenhauer, 2001).
Areas living under food apartheid and food swamps are dealing with multiple macro-
aggressions on a daily basis. Their neighborhoods face constant disinvestment, they are living
under poor economic conditions, and they have little to zero access to quality foods and
healthcare. All of these factors will undoubtedly impact a person’s long-term health, especially as
it pertains to their hearts. The fact that redlining, food apartheid, and food swamps can all have a
detrimental effect on cardiovascular risk is not an accident– it is by design. Later on, I will
33
discuss how incarceration can also affect cardiovascular health. All of these factors are
inextricably linked.
Access to Resources Not only do redlined neighborhoods have limited access to healthy foods, but also to
many other resources that could improve their health, well-being, and development. The Food
Trust, a local food-providing organization in Philadelphia, has been working hard to provide
healthier food options to people in these neighborhoods. The Food Trust is working to create
healthy corner stores, to bring healthy foods to food swamp areas in and around Philadelphia as
part of their Healthy Corner Store Initiative. According to the Food Trust website, the
organization provides fresh produce to these stores, as well as training, equipment, and
marketing materials to help sell the items (The Food Trust, 2022). Food Trust employee Wayne
Williams tells me:
When you look at the demographics of those that are incarcerated and where they live or
where they grew up, we know for the most part, most of them live under food apartheid.
And so, food is one aspect of that environment. But there's a whole list of other
circumstances that leads them to [incarceration.] Education, of course, is one of them.
These neighborhoods don’t just lack proper access to food, but also education, and they
are often left out of political conversations. So, with all this negligence, it's only natural
that most of the people we find in these neighborhoods are not only suffering from food
inequality, but they’re also suffering from other inequalities. That's what leads them, in
many cases, to the prison system (The Food Trust, 2023).
The quality of education in redlined neighborhoods is unfortunately low. A 2022 report found
that schools in the Philadelphia area are among the most segregated in the United States,
meaning that Black and brown students in Philadelphia are receiving substandard education
(Mezzacappa, 2022). According to the report, Philadelphia spends less per student than many
surrounding districts, even though most Philadelphia students, who are low-income students of
color, generally have more needs (Mezzacappa, 2022). The report states that:
34
American schools today are… highly segregated by economic status. Racial redlining of
neighborhoods has been replaced with exclusionary zoning policies that keep low-income
families out of certain communities. Housing markets are heavily impacted by school
district boundaries and attendance zones. And school choice policies create an uneven
playing field for families of different socioeconomic means trying to access different
schools (Potter, 2022).
Lack of education in these neighborhoods does not stop at schooling. Many residents in these
neighborhoods also lack education about the types of foods they should be eating, the nutrients
their bodies require, and the unhealthiness of the foods they are eating. According to a 2012
study that examined the health literacy and nutrition behaviors of a sample of adults enrolled in
SNAP, the researchers found that only 37% of participants had adequate health literacy. Less
than half of the participants reported using nutrition labels when purchasing food. Questions that
required numeracy skills were the most challenging for participants. Race and parental status
(whether or not the participants had children) were found to be significant predictors of health
literacy (Speirs et al., 2012). Many Philadelphians are users of the SNAP program: while
Philadelphia residents make up only 12% of Pennsylvania’s population, they represent 26% of
the 1.9 million Pennsylvanians enrolled in the program (Prihar, 2023).
Another consequence of redlining and White Flight impacting food access in Philadelphia
is the current public transit system, otherwise known as SEPTA (Southeastern Pennsylvania
Transit Authority). In the late 1930s and early 1940s, federal transit funding in Philadelphia was
dedicated to the development of freeways to surrounding suburbs for the white and wealthy
residents who could afford to live there (Segregation by Design). The systematic development of
highways and freeways across the United States was part of a larger urban renewal plan, which
targeted low-income Black communities for removal (Stromberg, 2015). “Highways were a tool
for justifying the destruction of many of these areas” (Stromberg, 2015). Urban renewal and
35
highway development are also part of the long-term legacy of disinvestment in low-income
Black urban communities due to redlining.
While Philadelphia removed many trolley stations that low-income and Black residents
depended on, they continued funding regional rail lines that serviced the same white, wealthy
suburbs (Segregation by Design). According to Segregation by Design, the Philadelphia budget
is servicing the suburbs at the expense of the inner city. While only 11% of commuters use the
regional rail, 40% of SEPTA’s entire budget is dedicated to it. Additionally, the city and county
of Philadelphia is contributing 83% of regional rail’s operating costs, while the four surrounding
suburban counties only contribute 17%. In other words, according to Segregation by Design, “the
city is paying for suburban transit service at the expense of local service” (Segregation by
Design).
In addition to transit redlining and disinvestment in Philadelphia, many low-income
residents also don’t own cars. According to U.S Census Data, Philadelphia is one of the most car-
free cities in the country (Otterbein, 2013). While many residents are car-free by choice, poverty
also plays a role. Philadelphia’s rate of poverty was over 26% in 2013, while 33% of families did
not own cars (Otterbein, 2013). Many families are unable to afford the costs of a car, leaving
them with few options to travel- including to supermarkets outside their neighborhoods. The
United States Department of Agriculture has measured Americans’ access to healthy food by
using ½-mile and 1-mile demarcations to the nearest supermarket for urban areas, 10-mile and
20-mile demarcations to the nearest supermarket for rural areas, and vehicle availability for all
tracts (USDA, 2021). When a family does not own a car, their access to food is impacted
severely.
36
All of these barriers- lack of education, public transportation, and car ownership- are
factors in a person’s access to food and their relationship to policing and prisons. These barriers
are a primary reason why so many residents in Philadelphia have taken up the cause of feeding
their neighbors. Matt Stebbins of the Coral Street Fridge tells me that “people are drowning in
many different waves. They don’t have access to a phone that they can apply for benefits on,
they don’t have access to transportation, or childcare, or caseworkers, many times English isn’t
their first language. And then they face barriers to food on top of everything else” (Coral Street
Fridge, 2023).
Gentrification Gentrification9 in lower class cities also plays a role in the access that residents have to
different resources, compared to their wealthier counterparts. When white and wealthy people
move back into cities to gentrify them, it changes the entire landscape of the city and which
resources go where. It also changes the way police interact with residents. Black residents might
have lived in a neighborhood much longer than the white people who are gentrifying the area,
but they are policed more due to the color of their skin. Simply put, according to Nicholas
Freudenberg, “there isn’t a simple relationship between percent Black and policing because of
the variable of gentrification. When middle class people move in, they want more policing, and
that policing is focused on Black and brown youth” (Freudenberg, 2023).
Because of the role that race and poverty play in segregation in Philadelphia, the only two
outcomes of gentrification for Black and brown residents are forced removal or over policing
(Harrison, 2022). According to Philadelphia based think tank Economy League, “residents in
9The process whereby the character of a poor urban area is changed by wealthier people moving in, improving housing, and
attracting new businesses, typically displacing current inhabitants in the process (Oxford Dictionary).
37
gentrifying neighborhoods note that social norms and surveillance—particularly in the form of
policing—change as previously low-income neighborhoods undergo the gentrification process”
(Smith and Shields, 2021).
According to the same report, non-gentrifying tracts had the largest proportion of stops,
followed respectively by gentrifying and non-gentrifiable tracts. In fact, in 2019, non-gentrifying
tracts—which are predominantly low-income with higher concentrations of Black and Latinx
residents—saw an average of 57 stop-and-frisks for every 100 residents. The scale of stops
greatly exceeds the violent crime rate (Smith and Shields, 2021).
Figure 9. Police Stops and Gentrification from 2014 to 2019. Source: Smith and Shields, 2021.
For decades while inner cities were ignored and disinvested in, they lacked access to
amenities like supermarkets, gardens and parks, and quality public schools. With the influx of
middle-class white people moving into these cities, these resources start to appear, but are only
accessible for the new residents—not the low-income Black people who were there before them.
38
While a common refrain might be that low-income neighborhoods should get these
resources before being gentrified, unfortunately these resources can lead to gentrification as well
(Johnson, 2021). A study found that planting trees was associated with gentrification over time,
otherwise known as green gentrification (Johnson, 2021). In fact, Alison Alkon believes that
community gardens can contribute greatly to green gentrification. She says that “sometimes
realtors and people who are really interested in urban development see a community garden and
think ‘oh, somebody cares about this place. I could open up a fancy coffee shop and make some
money or, I could sell the houses around here for more money, or I can put this in my
advertisement for why this neighborhood is up and coming’” (Alkon, 2023). It seems that lower-
income residents are caught in the trap of wanting to keep their homes versus wanting better
access to amenities for their health.
Gentrification can have a positive effect on food access in many communities, bringing in
new food outlets and grocery stores, but on the other hand is also responsible for driving out
affordable food retailers and bringing in higher priced restaurants and supermarkets to service
newer residents (Rick et al., 2022). Additionally, gentrification increases housing prices, making
many families more rent burdened and less able to purchase healthy foods (Rick et al., 2022).
The new food stores in these communities are not targeted towards long term residents who are
suffering from food insecurity; instead, the high-end grocery stores such as Whole Foods and
Trader Joes can contribute to their being priced and pushed out of their homes (Blackwell, 2016).
Gentrification is also a result of decades long redlining and disinvestment. Redlining has
devalued real estate in inner cities so much that it has now become profitable for investors to
come in and start making money by tearing them down and building higher priced homes (World
Food Policy Center). After decades of disinvestment that resulted in poor food access, education
39
quality, and greenery, gentrification makes clear that low-income Black and brown residents are
not worth investing in but their neighborhoods are once they become populated with middle class
white people.
Urban Gardening and Agriculture A popular response to food apartheid is urban gardens and farms. In Philadelphia, there
are hundreds of community gardens around the city, with new ones popping up each year
(Farming Philly). Urban agriculture is a form of resistance in line with the long tradition of Black
rebellion. It is a way for Black people living under food apartheid to take back control of the land
and control of the food that they are able to eat (Kathuria, 2023).
Community gardening can unfortunately play a role in green gentrification. Not only can
it make neighborhoods more desirable for new real estate, but also to new residents. However,
gardening does have a positive impact on crime. A study found that ‘sprucing up’ vacant lots by
cleaning up trash and mowing the grass curbed gun violence in Philadelphia neighborhoods by
nearly 30% (Dengler, 2018). The study reports that:
Neighbors felt safer. Residents living near lots converted to parklike environments
perceived less crime in their neighborhoods and reported feeling 58% less fearful of
going outside than people living near unimproved lots. People who lived near renovated
lots also used the spaces to relax and socialize 76% more than inhabitants near
unmodified lots (Dengler, 2018).
Community gardening can be a source of food sovereignty for many people living under food
apartheid. Andrea Vettori, the founder of Philadelphia’s Sanctuary Farm, says that residents in
the neighborhood are eating more greens than ever because of a pride that comes from knowing
that the food was grown in their own community (Sagner, 2021). Food sovereignty is becoming
more and more vital in an economy where not many people have access to healthy foods, and the
healthy foods available are outside their budget. Food organizers believe that food sovereignty is
40
the only way to ensure food security. Janice Tosto, who runs a community pantry out of North
Philadelphia, says that “we need to have systems in place where people have access to land so
that they can learn to grow their own food, and they can teach their neighbors to grow food”
(Tosto, 2023). According to Tosto, food sovereignty is one of the few ways to ensure that a
person will always have access to food.
On the contrary, other organizers and experts argue that food sovereignty on its own
cannot solve food insecurity. Because of the changing climate Philadelphia’s soil does not ensure
long term farming prospects. Gardening and food sovereignty also does not combat poverty.
Mariana Chilton is passionate about combating the root causes of poverty and hunger and
believes that community gardens do not do that. She tells me that “gardens help to ease the pain
of poverty, but they don't end poverty” (Chilton, 2022). The outcome of food sovereignty is
feeding people, but not addressing why they are hungry in the first place. There must be policies
in place to help people who are systematically underfed.
In our conversation, Chilton is adamant about the ways that poverty and hunger must be
addressed. She says that while there is a burgeoning community garden movement, its impacts
are limited. Without access to home kitchens or electricity, an outside garden is futile for many
people. The real impact of a garden, she says, is that it builds community:
They build a sense of resilience, and they help people connect with nature and connect
with their food and demonstrate respect and understanding the rhythms of life. Their
natural world is deeply important. But you're not going to see that making a change on
food insecurity, because food insecurity measures whether people have enough money for
food, so the measurement is different. (Chilton, 2022).
Still, urban gardening can be a way for Black Americans to reclaim their relationship
with farming and soil. Post slavery, Black farmers were evicted from farmlands in the South,
unable to own land and use their agriculture skills to support their families (Meredith, 2022).
41
However, with the recent boom in popularity of urban gardens, Black Americans are finding
their way back to the practice, according to Philadelphia urban gardener and food justice activist
Ashley Gripper:
Farming is not new to Black people. While some dominant modern narratives talk about
urban agriculture as an innovative way to build community and fight food insecurity,
Black folks in this country have been growing food in cities for as long as they have lived
in cities. Before that, our ancestors lived in a deep relationship with the land. Growing
food is a tool for dismantling systemic oppression (Gripper, 2020).
Many other Black Americans have been disconnected from farming, bearing inherited trauma
from oppression (Kuang, 2020). In their case, urban gardens are not the balm that they are to
others. They should still have access to healthy food in their neighborhoods, whether they want
to dig in the soil or not (Alkon, 2023).
42
Chapter 4: How Food Access Determines Police Presence
Introduction
I grew up in Queens, New York, which I find similar to my current neighborhood in West
Philadelphia. There are many similarities between the two cities, but one that seems to stick out
to me the most is the plethora of corner stores, also known as bodegas. Growing up, I would
walk home from school on Northern Boulevard in Jackson Heights and have at least three
bodegas to choose from when I wanted to purchase an after-school snack. The bodegas were
usually family owned and operated, and mainstays of the community. When I walk into similar
corner stores and bodegas now, in Philadelphia, I feel a pang of nostalgia for those days- but also
the realization that the situation is different in Philadelphia than it was for me in Queens. In
Queens, while there were many bodegas and corner stores, there were also multiple food markets
and grocery stores in the same neighborhoods. This is not the case for food swamp
neighborhoods in Philadelphia.
Criminalization of Corner Stores Many of the unhealthy food retailers in Philadelphia are corner stores and mini markets in
poorer neighborhoods. Corner stores have multiple links to the carceral justice system. Many of
them do not accept SNAP and EBT—which eliminates many poor people’s ability to shop
there—and they are also over policed.
In Cedar Park, a West Philadelphia neighborhood, a corner store that recently opened in
March 2023 has a sign in the doorway that reads “This location is under 24/7 live surveillance to
the 18th Precinct. Any illegal activity will be prosecuted. Drug dealers will be prosecuted to the
fullest extent of the law.”
43
Figure 10. A corner store threatening police action in West Philadelphia. Source: Photo taken by the author.
Due to the nature of these neighborhoods that were redlined, historically disinvested in,
and now live under poverty and food apartheid, many residents are forced to resort to activities
that are deemed illegal to earn money and feed their families. Corner stores have largely become
overpoliced because employees and police tend to assume the worst when dealing with Black
and poor residents. A recent and widely known example is seen in the death of George Floyd in
Minneapolis. Floyd was purchasing cigarettes from a corner store when the clerk noticed that the
bill he used to pay was counterfeit, and called the police when Floyd left the store. This act led to
the events that ended Floyd’s life (Bogel-Burroughs and Healy, 2021).
The painful and completely avoidable death of George Floyd signals a grave example of
the role that corner stores and their policing play in the oppression of Black Americans, as well
as the double standards that Black Americans face. When the government and banks
systematically exclude Black communities from building wealth and redline their neighborhoods
so that they cannot obtain mortgages and credit, no one is punished, criminalized, or incarcerated
44
for it. Yet when Floyd allegedly used a counterfeit bill at a corner store, no one paused before
calling the police. The fact that police were so quickly called to mediate a non-violent situation
exemplifies just how dependent this corner store was on the police in a city that is 18% Black
(census.gov).
While the intersection of policing and corner stores ended George Floyd’s life,
Minneapolis also suffers from food apartheid, which may be why Floyd was frequenting a corner
store to begin with. According to the Minneapolis 2040 Plan, which aims to increase food access
in the city, in 2015, Minneapolis had 11 census tracts that were considered healthy food access
priority areas. This means that residents in these areas are low-income and live more than one
mile from a grocery store. A much greater number of census tracts have no grocery stores within
a half-mile. Many of these food access priority areas are also areas of concentrated poverty
where over half the residents are people of color (Minneapolis 2040).
Minneapolis is not the only city where corner stores are heavily policed and surveilled.
Actually, Nicholas Freudenberg of the CUNY Urban Food Policy Institute described to me how
the visibility of corner stores aids in their relationship to crime and policing. He said that “many
corner stores are open 24 hours and they are very visible, they’re also places where people who
are involved with, or at risk of, crime might hang out and congregate. Therefore, the stores
become targets of policing whether or not there are other places that are equally risky, but not as
visible” (Freudenberg, 2023).
The visibility and centering of these corner stores contribute to their being targeted by the
police. They are sometimes described as ‘third places,’ which according to food justice organizer
Katherine Alaimo means that “if there's drug dealing, or criminal activity, then it can center
around that corner store because that's where people are; people have to go there to buy things.
45
They are ‘third places,’ which are places and neighborhoods where people can be, and criminal
activity happens there because there are always more people there” (Alaimo, 2023).
All of these factors contribute to the policing of corner stores, but at the end of the day,
they are some people’s only options for food. Not only are they the only food source in the
neighborhood, but the affordability of corner store food leaves many people with few other
options. This was a primary reason that Sonia Parikh and her sister Sonam Parikh opened the
West Philadelphia Community Fridge. When asked about their motivations in opening the fridge,
Sonia said “we are in an economic crisis– people can’t afford food. Grocery stores are shutting
down in underdeveloped neighborhoods. People are starting to steal of course because they need
to feed their family out of necessity. People have a scarcity mindset because they’re scared they'll
never have access to food again” (Parikh, 2023). Decades of disinvestment and redlining have
led to these attitudes.
Police Activity
Figure 11. The rate of pedestrian stop-and-
frisk incidents in Philadelphia between 2014 and 2015.
Source: Hannon,
2017.
46
Figure 11 shows the rate of pedestrian stop and frisk incidents in Philadelphia between
2014 and 2015. According to the study accompanying the map and the map itself, Black
residents in North Philadelphia experience the highest levels of stop and frisks. Relative to the
demographic characteristics of all those who were stopped by police, those stopped and frisked
were more likely to be Black, male, and younger (Hannon, 2017). North Philadelphia has a high
population of Black residents and had redlining grades that varied throughout the lower grade
levels. When compared to the map of low-produce supply stores, it is clear that North
Philadelphia has both a high concentration of these stores and also of pedestrian stop and frisk
incidents.
Daanika Gordon, a sociologist at Tufts University, has studied the ways policing differs
among segregated neighborhoods. She writes that she is observing two vastly
different neighborhoods and the way police respond in each. She says that the first neighborhood
is middle class, affluent, and predominantly white, while the second is largely Black and poor
(Smyton, 2020). When comparing policing in each area, Gordon says that:
In the former, the police act as responsive service providers. They are quick, thorough,
and helpful when citizens call, and they work collaboratively with residents and business
owners to solve local problems. In the latter, the police focus on intervening in violence.
They do so through tactics like investigatory stops, which many see as aggressive,
intimidating, and overbroad. In addition, the high volume of 911 calls in this district
means that patrol officers are stretched thin, and citizens have to wait longer for a
response to their emergencies (Smyton, 2020).
One example of over policing in areas of food apartheid can be seen in Indianapolis,
where Ashley Gurvitz has long advocated for better food access in low-income neighborhoods.
Gas station mini marts are the Indianapolis equivalent to Philadelphia’s corner stores. On the
Eastside, there are forty-four gas stations in a four-mile radius. Of those forty-four, two have the
47
same owner, and between those two locations, there were 1,800 police runs within one year.
Gurvitz told me that “those were just person to person interactions, not even trespassing or
misdemeanors” (Gurvitz, 2023). On top of this shocking statistic, the area only has one brick and
mortar grocery store to service 57,000 residents (Gurvitz, 2023). I was shocked to hear all of this
from Ashley. It validated my belief that these corner stores are magnets for the police, especially
in areas where residents don’t have many other food options.
The criminalization of hunger and poverty plays a role in the way police act in food
insecure neighborhoods. Instead of providing resources to people who are malnourished, police
are trained to target and arrest them for attempting to feed themselves and their families. Shep
Owen, the senior director of relief and humanitarian affairs for the international organization
Food for the Hungry, says “Poor access to food is why people are hungry. Food is the most
fundamental of human rights, and anyone who is pushed to the point of stealing for food is very
desperate” (Cather, 2019).
In February of 2022, a man was arrested in New York City for stealing multiple steaks
from a Trader Joe’s food store. In response, popular media figure Al Sharpton made an
appearance on MSNBC News to stigmatize the man and decry an increase in food theft
(Murdock, 2022). Derecka Purnell, organizer and author of Becoming Abolitionists took to
Twitter to speak on the matter, writing that:
Al Sharpton is laughing on TV about people stealing steaks. Maybe they wouldn’t steal
if, I don’t know, we ensured that people had money and not the police? But since policing
functions as a violent jobs program, so many politicians would rather pay police to
manage inequality than to do what it takes to eradicate inequality (Purnell, 2022).
Purnell’s perspective is the exact issue with policing in areas of food apartheid: while the
communities being policed could benefit from money and resources for more food, the money
instead goes to police who punish them for trying to survive.
48
SNAP and Food Stamps Living under food apartheid is made even more difficult for people who are limited to
using food stamps to buy food. “You want to go to the corner store that maybe accepts SNAP,
and when they don’t, you think your only option is stealing,” Sonia Parikh tells me. “On top of
that, we're shutting down all the grocery stores, the only places that do accept EBT. If you do
want groceries, you have to walk 3.5 miles” (Parikh, 2023).
According to a congressional report on social services, SNAP is subject to the “drug felon
ban,” which bars states from aiding persons convicted of drug-related felonies. The 2014 farm
bill also added new restrictions for certain ex-offenders seeking SNAP assistance (McCarty et
al., 2016). According to the study, five states as of 2016, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota,
Missouri, and Wisconsin, use drug testing as part of their modified drug felon ban. Pennsylvania
gives the SNAP agency authority to implement drug testing for SNAP, but the agency has not
done so yet as of August 2016 (McCarty et al., 2016). As of March 2023, all public assistance
(TANF, food stamps, general assistance, State supplemental assistance) applicants in
Pennsylvania convicted of a felony drug offense must undergo drug testing. At least 20% of
recipients convicted of a felony must undergo random drug testing during each six-month period
following enactment (World Population Review, 2023).
Availability of food stamps impacts not just one person, but their entire family. When a
person with a drug felony cannot access SNAP, everyone in their household suffers alongside
them. And data has proven the importance of food security for children. A study conducted by
the National Bureau of Economic Research focused on the long-term return on investment of
social services such as food stamps. The study found that childhood exposure to Food Stamps
leads to an increase in likelihood of home ownership, residence in a single-family home, and
49
overall improvement in the quality of the neighborhoods in which children end up living as
adults (J. Bailey et al., 2020). If a child’s parent is denied access to food stamps, it can have an
adverse effect on the child throughout their life.
SNAP access can also play a role in the school-to-prison pipeline10 for students from low-
income families. Social assistance programs such as SNAP invest in children with the
expectation that their outcomes in school will improve by receiving food assistance (Gennetian
et al., 2016). A study found that students whose families received SNAP were more likely than
students whose families did not receive SNAP to have disciplinary infractions at the end of the
monthly SNAP disbursement cycle than at the beginning of the cycle, and that this effect was
particularly pronounced for male students (Gennetian et al., 2016). This is evidence that hunger
and malnourishment can result in outbursts and “bad” behavior from students, and that children
whose families receive SNAP are more likely to behave well when they are well fed rather than
when they are not. The same can be said for adults: a study found that a 10% increase in hunger
raises violent crime by 3.6% (Islam, 2021).
Students who are more heavily disciplined in schools are 17 percent more likely to be
arrested and 20 percent more likely to go to jail in their adulthood (Bacher-Hicks, et al., 2023).
According to the same study, “school strictness increases later involvement in crimes related to
illegal drugs, fraud, arson, and burglary, but not in serious violent crimes like murder,
manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault” (Bacher-Hicks, et al., 2023). Whether or not
a family has access to SNAP benefits can impact a child throughout their life well into adulthood
and play a role in their relationship with the carceral justice system for decades.
10The school-to-prison pipeline refers to practices and policies that disproportionately place students of color into
the criminal justice system. The biased application of harsh disciplinary measures and overuse of referrals to law enforcement contribute to the problem, setting up vulnerable students for failure and ignoring the underlying causes (School of Education, 2021).
50
Not only are people with drug felonies exempt from accessing SNAP in many states, but
states also have work and income requirements to qualify for SNAP. In Pennsylvania, “children,
seniors, pregnant women, and people living with physical or mental disabilities are exempt from
the work requirement. Everyone else must be working, participating in training programs, have
lost their jobs, or have seen their hours reduced to qualify” (Myers, 2023). This can prove
difficult for returning citizens who are searching for work. If they are unable to attain work and
income because of their criminal records, they are also ineligible for SNAP benefits.
While the relationship between food access, incarceration, and policing are currently
understudied, it is vital to continue the work. It’s clear that people with a history of felony
charges and their families struggle to have fresh and healthy foods, which can lead to recidivism
and an intergenerational cycle of policing and imprisonment. Additionally, neighborhoods with
large swaths of corner stores have become hotspots for policing, crimes, and violence. Investing
in these communities with amenities such as parks, recreation centers, and education can help
reduce these rates.
51
Chapter 5: Recommendations
When attempting to rectify the long-term impacts of racist policies such as food
apartheid, redlining, and mass incarceration, there are multiple needs. No single solution will be
able to provide reparations and ensure that these practices cease.
Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath, more and more people are
suffering from hunger. According to The Urban Institute, the percentage of adults reporting food
insecurity increased from 20% to almost 25% between December 2021 and December 2022
(Martinchek et al., 2023). While community responses to food insecurity, e.g., fridges, pantries,
and gardens, are vital, so too are government responses. Truthfully, a community suffering from
food insecurity should not hold the burden of alleviating that insecurity themselves. The Center
for American Progress released a report in August 2022 detailing long term strategies the
government can take in order to end food insecurity. They list the three strategies as 1) reducing
poverty as a first step to reducing hunger, 2) creating accessible and affordable food production
and distribution systems, and 3) addressing the impacts of climate change on food and improving
market competition to ensure long-term food sustainability (Pathak et al., 2022).
Reducing Poverty
It would be impossible to combat food apartheid, redlining, and incarceration without
also combating the myriad other issues that people face alongside them. I firmly believe that in
order to create a free and just world where everyone can thrive with enough food, economic
opportunity, clean air and water, green space, and quality education, we must first provide
families with universal basic income so that they can afford their basic needs; subsidized or rent
controlled housing, so that they are never at risk of losing their homes; universal school lunches,
so that no child goes hungry based on the economic condition of their families; and free
52
healthcare, so that regardless of employment, people are able to receive medical attention at all
times. Only with these benefits will we create truly healthy communities.
The legacy of redlining must also be abolished in order to address racism in our built
environment. The following table recommends action areas and strategies to reverse the historic
impact of redlining.
Table 1. Recommended Action Areas and Strategies to Reverse the Impact of Historic Redlining.
Action Areas Strategies
Healthcare • Expand mandatory coverage of non-clinician
services in Medicaid: pharmacy, community
health worker, home nursing.
• Design value-based health system payments
to incentivize addressing social needs, such as
offering food vouchers.
Economic Empowerment • Minimum wage increases based on federal
guidelines.
• Standardize asset limits (asset tests) in
public benefit programs (e.g., eliminating
asset limits for Temporary Assistance for
Needy Families (TANF), the Low-Income
Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP),
and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP)).
• Tax incentives to create employment in
historically redlined neighborhoods.
Food • Broaden SNAP coverage and eliminate state
level SNAP asset tests.
• Use incentives like Healthy Food Financing
Initiative or New Market Tax Credits to
increase retail outlets in redlined
neighborhoods.
• Remove zoning barriers and provide tax
incentives for supermarket or healthy retail
store placement.
• Expedite reviews and approval for grocery
store site placement.
Source: Egede et al., 2023
53
Creating Accessible and Affordable Food Production
The City of Minneapolis has compiled a plan to improve the city in many ways by the
year 2040. Part of the plan is a goal to establish equitable distribution of food sources and food
markets to provide all Minneapolis residents with reliable access to healthy, affordable, safe, and
culturally appropriate food (Minneapolis 2040). Below are the action steps they aim to take in
order to achieve this goal.
Figure 12. The City of Minneapolis Action Steps to Establish Equitable Distribution of Food Sources and Food Markets for all Residents by 2040. Source: Minneapolis 2040
I believe that many of these action steps should be taken not just by Minneapolis, but by
cities across the country. Philadelphia leadership can also take many of these steps, including
requiring licensed grocery stores to stock nutritious foods. Given the concentration of corner
54
stores and mini markets around the city, we should take advantage. They should be required to
stock healthy and nutritious foods at affordable prices. In recent years, Philadelphia City
Councilman Kenyatta Johnson has introduced zoning bonuses as well as reforms to the bonus to
ensure that low-income and marginalized neighborhoods have fresh food retailers (Blumgart,
2019). Creating more zoning bonuses like these is crucial to ensuring the development of more
fresh food retailers.
There is also space for Philadelphia to follow Action Step C on the list, which would
require the city to attract and build new supermarkets in low-income neighborhoods. According
to the City of Philadelphia, there are approximately 40,000 vacant lots around the city (City of
Philadelphia). Steps must be taken to use these lots instead as grocery store locations. In
conjunction with the Pennsylvania Fresh Food Financing Initiative, Philadelphia is a national
leader in grocery store zoning laws (Chapple et al., 2020). The city offers a package of zoning
incentives and gives residents across the city access to healthier foods by removing zoning
barriers that make grocery store development less profitable (Chapple et al., 2020). By
continuing to create accessible zoning laws for grocery store development, Philadelphia can
ensure that more residents have fresh foods in their neighborhoods.
The Philadelphia Food Policy Advisory Council (FPAC) has been working for years to
improve the Philadelphia food economy and has published multiple reports on how to support
the local food system and improve the health of Philadelphians. In a report published in 2014, the
group recommended four direct steps to reduce hunger and improve health in the region. They
recommended supporting policies and programs that promote community health and end hunger,
strengthening the economy by improving local workers and local food procurement, empowering
the mayor’s food policy advisory council to lead food policy reform, and emphasizing the
55
importance of urban agriculture as a pathway to food democracy (Philadelphia Food Policy
Advisory Council, 2014). As per the arguments of many food justice and policy experts that I
spoke to throughout my research, urban agriculture is a key part of food sovereignty, and should
be prioritized as a way for Philadelphia residents to improve their health and well-being.
Addressing the Impacts of Climate Change on Food
Philadelphia is on the right track when it comes to addressing the impacts of climate
change on the food system. The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society and the National Wildlife
Federation have teamed up to transform vacant lots in Philadelphia into climate resilient gardens-
using the region’s native plants to ensure that they can adapt to changing conditions (Shah,
2021). Taking the next step and using these gardens to grow food is one way to ensure that the
Philadelphia food system is prepared to fight the impacts of climate change.
Farmers and food justice activists are fighting to include stipulations for climate change
in the new 2023 Farm Bill (Held, 2023). Climate change has disproportionately impacted
farmers and food growth. Droughts, floods, and wildfires are destroying crops and threatening
livelihoods and food supplies more frequently and severely than ever before. Increasing
temperatures also cause heat and water stress that directly impact the productivity of both crops
and livestock. Agriculture’s emissions have also been rising, especially when it comes to shorter-
lived greenhouse gas methane (Held, 2023).
Activists are proposing two ideas to better the Farm Bill and protect farmers and food.
One, they suggest more money be added to programs such as conservation, since currently, many
farmers are being denied federal support due to lack of funding (Held, 2023). Secondly,
advocates would like that the programs with clear climate benefits be prioritized over other
practices (Held, 2023). With climate change being such a looming danger to food growth, it is
56
vital that the federal government prioritize farmers in the new Farm Bill, especially because
Black and brown farmers are also more likely to be climate refugees11.
In the vein of abolitionists such as Ashante M. Reese and Ruth Wilson Gilmore, I believe
that the abolition of policing and prisons will never occur in a vacuum. While police brutality
and mass incarceration are killing countless Black Americans annually, so too are environmental
factors that intentionally target them. Ruth Wilson Gilmore describes the intersection of the
environment and abolition by saying that:
Abolition has to be “green.” It has to take seriously the problem of environmental harm,
environmental racism, and environmental degradation. To be “green” it has to be “red.” It
has to figure out ways to generalize the resources needed for well-being for the most
vulnerable people in our community, which then will extend to all people. And to do that,
to be “green” and “red,” it has to be international. It has to stretch across borders so that
we can consolidate our strength, our experience, and our vision for a better world
(Kumanyika, 2020).
Reversing the Links Between Food, Policing, and Incarceration
As I’ve written throughout this thesis, there are clear links between food access and the
American criminal and carceral justice system. The recent murder of George Floyd outside a
corner store signifies the way that corner stores and food apartheid are linked to violent policing.
In fact, in the aftermath of Floyd’s murder, the owner of the store that called the police on him
told reporters that he will now only call 911 in instances of violence (Bogel-Burroughs and
Healy, 2021). I believe this is a step that all food retailers can take- avoid involving the police in
interactions with Black people if there is no violence committed.
There are also policy changes that can be made in order to untie food from the carceral
justice system. Firstly, SNAP must be made available to all Americans who need it, regardless of
11People who have been forced to leave their traditional habitat, temporarily or permanently, because of marked
environmental disruption (McAllister, 2023).
57
theirs or a family member’s criminal history. Families must not be punished by losing access to
SNAP benefits due to the actions of one family member. Craig Gunderson, a food insecurity
scholar, and expert, has proposed a universal basic income approach to SNAP, writing that the
government should give all families the benefits they need to purchase foods to support a
balanced diet. Doing so would nearly eliminate food insecurity entirely across the United States
(Gunderson, 2021).
Allowing all families equitable access to SNAP benefits would positively impact
children, as would universal free school lunches. Students who experience food insecurity or
lack the resources to access fresh food, go to school hungry and are more likely to engage in
social and behavioral problems and be punished as a result (Soliz, 2021). Providing all school
aged children with food and lunches would result in less infractions at school, and reduce the
likelihood of punishments and arrests, also lowering the school to prison pipeline.
Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, every school enrolled in the National
School Lunch Program (NSLP) could offer its students free meals, regardless of their family’s
income (Marshall-Chalmers, 2023). This policy was reversed in 2022: a step backwards for
many parents who cannot afford to feed their children. Since then, momentum has been building
to revive the pandemic’s model of school food access. Lawmakers in Minnesota, California,
Colorado, New Mexico, and Maine have all committed to funding what are often referred to as
universal free meals (Marshall-Chalmers, 2023). A new group, called the Healthy School Meals
for All Coalition, is fighting Congress to bring back universal school lunches. The group’s
members consist of advocacy groups, medical associations, teachers’ unions, and parent
organizations (Marshall-Chalmers, 2023). They are all in agreement that free school lunches will
only benefit not just children, but their entire families.
58
While this thesis has not found a direct correlation between food apartheid and
incarceration, there are unmistakably links between the two. Food apartheid and incarceration
both stem from the same root of targeted racist policies such as redlining, environmental racism,
and the 13th Amendment. People living under food apartheid and people with a history of
incarceration as well as their family members are predisposed to diet related diseases such as
diabetes and hypertension. I believe this thesis can and should be used as a stepping stone into
the conversation on the correlations which should be studied to support the policies described
above.
59
Chapter 6: Conclusion
Food apartheid and redlining are both outcomes of systemic racism in this country that
impact poor Black and brown people every day. The same communities that are constantly
disinvested in, paid less wages than their counterparts, denied healthy foods, and discriminated
against are also the most likely to be arrested and incarcerated. All of these mechanisms work in
tandem to keep the most oppressed members of our community down, and also keep them
unhealthy and with shorter life spans.
In order to achieve true equality and justice throughout our society, we must unpack the
ways that oppression is built into the very core of this country. Policing in the United States first
began as a response to runaway slaves, and prisons first began as a way to continue enslaving
Black people post-emancipation. We must examine the other ways that racism has been built into
our society, and I hope that this thesis offers a first step to examining how food apartheid and
redlining are also linked to policing and prisons.
There will never be one simple way to achieve true equity and reparations for America’s
most oppressed people, but there will always be small steps we can take to forge the path ahead.
It is my hope that this paper offers someone even a hint of inspiration or motivation to examine
even more ways that food apartheid is linked to incarceration and how we can start reversing
this.
60
Works Cited
Ackley, Jada. 2020. “Environmental Racism in Philly: A ‘Dirty’ History.” Green Philly. July 23, 2020.