In today's dynamic and interconnected business landscape, organizations must navigate a complex web of relationships with various stakeholders who wield substantial influence over their success. Strategic positioning from a stakeholder perspective has emerged as a pivotal approach for organizations to establish a favorable image, solidify relationships, and achieve long-term sustainability. As indicated by (Baraldi and Ratajczak-Mrozek, 2019), strategic positioning, as viewed through the lens of stakeholders, transcends traditional market-oriented strategies. It entails crafting a deliberate and multifaceted identity that resonates positively with stakeholders, including customers, investors, employees, suppliers, regulators, and communities. The significance of this approach lies in its capacity to foster trust, enhance reputation, and create a strong foundation for collaboration. By acknowledging and addressing stakeholder concerns, organizations can align their objectives with broader societal expectations, thereby mitigating risks and capitalizing on opportunities (Cote, 2020). Besides, (Eskerod, Huemann, and Savage, 2015), adds that central to strategic positioning is a profound comprehension of stakeholder needs, values, and perceptions. Therefore, organizations must engage in rigorous research and analysis to discern the intricate motivations and expectations of different stakeholder groups. This insight informs the crafting of a tailored positioning strategy that addresses unique concerns and resonates with each stakeholder segment. Also, strategic positioning necessitates a clear articulation of the value proposition that an organization offers to its stakeholders. This goes beyond monetary value and extends to encompass factors such as ethical practices, environmental responsibility, and social impact. By aligning the value proposition with stakeholder aspirations, organizations can forge deeper connections and enhance credibility (Cote, 2020).

Strategic positioning from a stakeholder perspective yields several profound implications for organizational success. Foremost, it empowers organizations to proactively manage reputational risks and capitalize on opportunities by aligning their actions with stakeholder expectations. This, in turn, can lead to increased stakeholder loyalty, improved customer retention, and enhanced investor confidence. Furthermore, organizations that prioritize stakeholder engagement are better equipped to navigate crises, leveraging the reservoirs of goodwill they have cultivated over time (Pedrini and Ferri, 2019).

Additionally, strategic positioning enhances an organization's social license to operate. By addressing stakeholder concerns, demonstrating social responsibility, and actively contributing to communities, organizations can secure the support and goodwill required to thrive in increasingly conscious consumer and investor environments trends (Edvardsson, Enquist, and Hay, 2006). This resonates with a broader shift toward values-driven business models that prioritize purpose alongside profit.

Thus, by recognizing the vital role stakeholders play in an organization's success, and by aligning values, actions, and communication with stakeholder expectations, organizations can establish a favorable image, strengthen relationships, and drive sustainable growth. In an era where stakeholder influence is paramount, organizations that master strategic positioning stand to reap the rewards of enhanced reputation, heightened loyalty, and enduring success.

IKEA is a Swedish furniture retailer that was founded in 1943 by Ingvar Kamprad. The company has grown to become one of the world's largest furniture retailers, with over 400 stores in 52 countries. IKEA's business model is based on offering affordable furniture and home furnishings that are stylish, functional, and easy to assemble. The company's products are designed to appeal to a wide range of customers, from young professionals to families and students. IKEA's success is due in part to its innovative business model and marketing strategy. The company's flat-pack furniture and self-assembly model has disrupted the traditional furniture industry and helped the company to offer affordable products to a wide range of customers. By using flat-pack furniture, IKEA is able to reduce transportation costs and pass on the savings to customers. The self-assembly model also allows customers to save money by assembling the furniture themselves, rather than paying for expensive delivery and assembly services. IKEA's marketing strategy is also unique and innovative. The company's stores are designed to create a unique and enjoyable shopping experience for customers. IKEA's stores are large and spacious, with a wide range of products on display. Customers are encouraged to explore the store and try out the furniture, which helps to create a sense of excitement and discovery. IKEA's stores also feature a range of amenities, such as restaurants and play areas for children, which helps to create a welcoming and family-friendly atmosphere. Despite its success, IKEA has faced some challenges and criticisms over the years. The company has been criticized for the quality of some of its products, as well as concerns about the working conditions of its suppliers in some countries. IKEA has also faced criticism over its reliance on cost-cutting measures to keep prices low, which some argue has led to a decline in product quality. Despite these challenges, IKEA has continued to grow and expand into new markets. The company has set ambitious targets for reducing its environmental impact and has invested in renewable energy and other initiatives to promote sustainability. IKEA's commitment to sustainability and ethical practices has helped to build a positive brand image and reputation, which has helped the company to maintain its competitive position in the furniture industry. Consequently, this report will analyze the significance of IKEA’s strategic positioning from a stakeholder perspective.

This report will use the SWOT analysis, PESTEL analysis and Porter’s five forces to examine the effectiveness of the strategic positioning utilized by IKEA from a stakeholder point of view.

Findings

The SWOT analysis provides a comprehensive overview of IKEA's internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats in the competitive market landscape (Sammut-Bonnici, and Galea, 2014). This analysis offers valuable insights into the company's current position and potential directions for its future strategy.

1. Strong brand reputation: IKEA is a well-known brand with a strong reputation for affordable and stylish furniture and home furnishings.

2. Efficient supply chain: IKEA has an efficient supply chain that allows it to offer low prices to customers.

3. Unique product design: IKEA's products are designed to be functional, stylish, and affordable, which sets it apart from competitors.

4. Strong online presence: IKEA has a strong online presence, which allows it to reach a wider audience and offer convenient shopping options.

5. Sustainable practices: IKEA has a strong commitment to sustainability and has implemented various initiatives to reduce its environmental impact.

1. Limited product range: IKEA's product range is limited to furniture and home furnishings, which may limit its appeal to some customers.

2. Limited customization options: IKEA's products are designed to be assembled by customers, which limits customization options.

3. Dependence on suppliers: IKEA relies on a few key suppliers for its products, which may pose a risk to its supply chain.

4. Limited physical presence: IKEA has a limited physical presence in some regions, which may limit its reach and appeal to customers.

5. Complex store layout: IKEA's stores are known for their complex layout, which may be overwhelming for some customers.

1. Expansion into new markets: IKEA has the opportunity to expand into new markets and reach new customers.

2. Diversification of product range: IKEA can diversify its product range to include new categories, such as electronics or appliances.

3. Expansion of online presence: IKEA can expand its online presence to reach more customers and offer more convenient shopping options.

4. Partnership with other brands: IKEA can partner with other brands to offer complementary products and services.

5. Expansion of sustainability initiatives: IKEA can expand its sustainability initiatives to further reduce its environmental impact and appeal to environmentally conscious customers.

1. Intense competition: IKEA faces intense competition from other furniture retailers, both online and offline.

2. Economic downturns: Economic downturns can impact consumer spending and reduce demand for IKEA's products.

3. Changes in consumer preferences: Changes in consumer preferences can impact demand for IKEA's products and require the company to adapt its product range and marketing strategies.

4. Political instability: Political instability in some regions can impact IKEA's supply chain and operations.

5. Needs for Maintaining that same level of cost effectiveness.

A PESTEL analysis examines the external macro-environmental factors that can impact a business or organization (Yüksel, 2012). In the case of IKEA, these factors provide insights into the challenges and opportunities the company may encounter in its operating environment. The following is a PESTEL analysis of IKEA.

Political Political factors play a significant role in shaping IKEA's business operations, especially in international markets. The company's expansion into various countries requires it to navigate different political systems, regulations, and policies. For instance, entering India posed challenges due to strict local sourcing regulations and corporate social responsibility requirements. To address these challenges, IKEA had to find producers that met its sustainability standards. Moreover, political stability and government policies can impact supply chain operations, trade agreements, and labor laws, all of which can influence IKEA's costs and operations.

Economic factors are crucial in determining consumer spending patterns and demand for IKEA's products. Economic growth, exchange rates, and interest rates directly affect consumer purchasing power and affordability. In times of economic downturn, consumers may reduce discretionary spending, impacting IKEA's sales. Conversely, during periods of economic prosperity, consumers may have higher disposable income, leading to increased demand for home furnishings. Fluctuations in exchange rates can influence the cost of raw materials and sourcing, affecting the company's profitability and pricing strategies.

Social factors encompass demographic shifts, cultural trends, and consumer behavior. IKEA's success lies in its ability to understand and cater to the preferences and lifestyles of its diverse customer base. Demographic changes, such as aging populations or evolving family structures, can impact the demand for specific furniture products. Cultural trends, such as a focus on sustainability and minimalism, have driven IKEA to expand its range of eco-friendly products and promote responsible consumption. Additionally, shifts in consumer behavior, such as the rise of online shopping, necessitate continuous adaptation of IKEA's distribution and marketing strategies.

Technological advancements influence various aspects of IKEA's operations. The growth of e-commerce has transformed the retail landscape, prompting IKEA to invest in its online presence to meet evolving consumer expectations. Automation and digitalization impact supply chain management, inventory control, and manufacturing processes. Innovation is essential to remain competitive, and IKEA leverages technology to enhance customer experience, offer virtual design tools, and improve operational efficiency.

Environmental sustainability is a central focus for IKEA. The company's commitment to sustainable practices aligns with changing consumer values and regulatory pressures. IKEA's efforts to reduce its carbon footprint, implement eco-friendly designs, and source responsibly resonate with environmentally conscious customers. Addressing climate change, resource scarcity, and environmental regulations is integral to maintaining IKEA's positive brand image and reducing long-term operational risks.

Legal factors encompass regulations, laws, and standards that impact IKEA's operations. Intellectual property protection ensures the uniqueness of IKEA's designs and prevents infringement. Compliance with employment laws and regulations is critical for maintaining a positive workplace environment and avoiding legal disputes. Ensuring product safety and meeting standards in various markets is essential to prevent reputational damage and ensure customer trust.

The Porter's Five Forces analysis provides a comprehensive framework for assessing the competitive landscape and industry dynamics that impact a company's profitability and strategic decision-making (Wu, Tseng, and Chiu, 2012).

IKEA has established a strong global brand and a unique market position, which serves as a barrier to new entrants. The company's cost-efficient operations, vast supplier network, and economies of scale make it challenging for new competitors to replicate its business model. Additionally, IKEA's diversified store formats and emphasis on sustainability create further barriers for new entrants to gain a competitive foothold. However, the threat of new entrants could increase in markets where IKEA's physical presence is limited or where local competitors gain traction.

IKEA's supplier network is extensive, and the company's emphasis on local sourcing in some markets helps reduce the bargaining power of individual suppliers. Besides, IKEA sources nearly 50% of its products locally, allowing it to maintain competitive pricing. Furthermore, the company's scale and global reach enable it to negotiate favorable terms with suppliers. However, the dependence on suppliers for raw materials and components does pose a certain level of risk, especially if supply chain disruptions occur.

IKEA utilizes a cost leadership strategy, which offers customers affordable prices. This strategy can reduce the bargaining power of individual buyers, as the low prices attract a wide customer base. However, consumer preferences and the rise of online shopping give buyers more information and options, potentially increasing their bargaining power. As IKEA expands its online presence, customers may gain more control over their purchasing decisions, affecting pricing and sales.

The threat of substitutes is moderate for IKEA, primarily because the company's product offering is distinctive. While customers have the option to explore used furniture, custom-made pieces, and alternative home decor solutions, IKEA's flat-pack, self-assembled furniture and innovative designs set it apart. The combination of affordability, style, and convenience creates a unique value proposition that differentiates IKEA from substitutes. However, the company must continue to innovate and address changing consumer preferences to counter potential substitutes effectively.

IKEA faces intense competition, both from traditional furniture retailers and online marketplaces. The company's cost leadership and differentiation strategies help mitigate rivalry to some extent. IKEA's emphasis on sustainability and ethical practices also distinguishes it from competitors. However, the competitive landscape remains challenging due to the numerous players in the industry. Rapid technological advancements and changing consumer preferences contribute to heightened rivalry, requiring IKEA to continuously innovate and adapt.

The integration of SWOT analysis, Porter's Five Forces, and PESTEL analysis within the report represents a powerful and comprehensive approach to evaluating IKEA's strategic positioning from a stakeholder perspective. Each of these analytical frameworks contributes a distinct layer of understanding, collectively illuminating the intricate dynamics that shape IKEA's competitive position, operational environment, and stakeholder relationships.

Starting with the SWOT analysis, this framework provides an introspective examination of IKEA's internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats. The identification of strengths such as a strong brand reputation, efficient supply chain, unique product design, and sustainable practices underscores the company's strategic advantages. These attributes play a pivotal role in cultivating stakeholder relationships by offering products that resonate with customers' needs, employees' values, and community expectations (Smith and Love, 2004). Conversely, the acknowledgment of weaknesses, such as limited product range, customization options, and potential supplier dependence, demonstrates a balanced and candid assessment. This recognition allows IKEA to proactively address areas of concern, align its strategies with stakeholder preferences, and implement measures to mitigate vulnerabilities. Ultimately, by recognizing and enhancing its strengths and addressing weaknesses, IKEA can tailor its strategic positioning to foster stakeholder satisfaction and long-term engagement (Smudde and Courtright, 2011).

The application of Porter's Five Forces framework enriches the analysis by examining the external competitive landscape that influences IKEA's strategic decisions and stakeholder relationships. The framework's comprehensive exploration of new entrants, supplier and buyer bargaining power, threat of substitutes, and competitive rivalry illuminates the complex interplay between stakeholders and market dynamics (Chang, Fernando, and Tripathy, 2015). It becomes evident that IKEA's strategic positionings are not only shaped by the preferences of individual stakeholders but also by the broader market forces that affect industry structure and competitive behavior. For instance, the framework highlights the challenge of intense competition within the furniture industry. This prompts IKEA to continuously refine its strategic positioning to remain distinctive and appealing to various stakeholders, such as customers seeking affordable, stylish furnishings, employees seeking growth opportunities, and shareholders seeking sustainable returns. By strategically positioning itself amidst these competitive forces, IKEA can effectively manage stakeholder expectations while adapting to evolving market trends (Edvardsson, Enquist, and Hay, 2006).

The PESTEL analysis further enriches the analysis by considering the macro-environmental factors that impact IKEA's operations and stakeholder relationships. This assessment recognizes that stakeholder satisfaction is intrinsically linked to broader societal trends, technological shifts, economic conditions, and regulatory environments. By evaluating the political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal dimensions, the PESTEL analysis emphasizes how IKEA's strategic positioning need to be attuned to the changing landscape and diverse stakeholder needs. For example, the analysis highlights the importance of IKEA's commitment to sustainability and ethical practices. This aligns with growing societal expectations for environmentally responsible business conduct, resonating with both environmentally conscious customers and communities (WU, 2019). The PESTEL analysis thus underscores how IKEA's strategic positioning extend beyond mere profitability to encompass a broader responsibility to stakeholders and society at large.

The cost leadership strategy involves becoming the most cost-effective organization in a particular industry. This strategy is one of the components of Porter's Generic Competitive Strategies, where competitive advantage can be achieved through lower costs than competitors, offering high-value products or services at premium prices, or concentrating on a specific customer niche (Tanwar, 2013). To simplify, generic plans can be categorized as cost leadership, differentiation, and focus.

Many manufacturers typically create a product and then try to determine how to produce it within a set target price. However, IKEA takes a different approach where price is the initial consideration. IKEA achieves cost leadership through various methods, such as cost control from product design to manufacturing, redefining the role of customers in the process, their flat-pack strategy, and their store environment.

Besides, IKEA employs its own team of designers and engineers to create affordable, modular furniture designed for customer assembly, in contrast to some competitors that rely heavily on third-party manufacturers. Furthermore, their selection of suppliers is primarily based on cost, and they collaborate closely with these suppliers to ensure efficient operations and maximize profits.

One important concept that involves customer participation in achieving low prices is that IKEA customers are required to select and transport their chosen items themselves within the store, rather than receiving free home delivery. Customers must browse through the showroom, pick up unassembled (flat-pack) items, place them in a shopping cart, and then proceed to the cashier. This high level of customer involvement in the shopping experience contributes to the affordability of IKEA's products.

Flat-pack furniture is another element contributing to IKEA's cost leadership strategy. The concept of ready-to-assemble furniture was initially introduced in 1953 by Grills Lundgren, one of IKEA's earliest employees (WU, 2019). At that time, insurance firms were frequently reporting furniture damage during shipping to clients. To mitigate this issue and save on shipping space, IKEA began selling unassembled furniture. This approach not only reduced the risk of damage but also played a role in lowering furniture prices.

Furthermore, IKEA employs a standardized store layout worldwide, typically situated on the outskirts of cities near highways to minimize costs. Also, instead of categorizing items into different sections, IKEA displays all products together without separation. Additionally, IKEA employs a one-way layout that allows all visitors to easily find what they are looking for. After completing the layout, customers can collect their chosen items and proceed to the cashier. This shopping environment not only reduces costs but also attracts more potential customers.

The analysis of IKEA's strategic positioning from a stakeholder perspective reveals a profound commitment to creating value beyond financial metrics. By embracing a holistic approach that considers the needs and expectations of various stakeholders, IKEA has established itself as a global leader in the furniture retail industry. The company's innovative business model, unique product design, efficient supply chain, and dedication to sustainability have not only contributed to its remarkable success but have also fostered strong and enduring stakeholder relationships (Kim, Song, and Koo, 2008).

From customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders, and the community, IKEA's strategic positioning has been meticulously designed to align with the interests of each stakeholder group. The emphasis on delivering value through affordable, functional, and stylish products resonates with customers, fostering loyalty and satisfaction. Meanwhile, the creation of a positive work environment, opportunities for growth, and recognition of employee contributions enhance employee satisfaction and retention, consequently elevating customer experiences.

IKEA's proactive engagement with suppliers, characterized by long-term relationships, fair pricing, and ethical practices, showcases a commitment to building trust and collaboration. Simultaneously, its dedication to sustainability and social responsibility establishes a positive reputation within communities, thereby engendering customer loyalty and heightened employee morale.

To further bolster IKEA's strategic positioning and maintain its competitive edge in the dynamic furniture retail industry, the following recommendations are suggested:

1. Enhance Customization Options: While IKEA's self-assembly model promotes affordability and simplicity, offering some degree of customization could attract a broader range of customers. Providing options for personalized finishes, sizes, or configurations would allow customers to tailor products to their specific needs and preferences.

2. Expand Product Diversification: As part of its efforts to reach a wider audience, IKEA could consider diversifying its product range beyond furniture and home furnishings. This could include expanding into related categories such as electronics, home appliances, or smart home solutions, offering customers a one-stop shopping experience.

3. Strengthen Sustainability Initiatives: Given the growing importance of environmental concerns, IKEA should continue to advance its sustainability initiatives. This could involve increasing the use of sustainable materials, reducing waste, and further integrating eco-friendly practices into its supply chain and operations. Communicating these efforts transparently to customers can enhance the brand's appeal (Flammer, Hong, and Minor, 2019).

4. Leverage Technology for Customer Experience: IKEA should continue to invest in technology to enhance the overall customer experience. This could involve the development of user-friendly augmented reality (AR) or virtual reality (VR) tools that allow customers to visualize how products fit into their spaces before making a purchase. Additionally, enhancing its online shopping platform and digital engagement can cater to evolving consumer preferences.

5. Localized Marketing and Product Adaptation: Tailoring marketing strategies and product offerings to specific regional preferences and cultural trends can resonate more effectively with local customers. Adapting product designs and offerings to align with the unique needs and tastes of different markets demonstrates a commitment to meeting customer expectations.

6. Strengthen Supplier Relationships: While IKEA's global supplier network is a strength, fostering deeper relationships with suppliers and ensuring ethical and sustainable practices throughout the supply chain can further enhance the brand's reputation. Collaboration with suppliers to innovate and address challenges can result in higher-quality products and reduced supply chain risks.

7. Empower Employee Engagement: Engaging and empowering employees can contribute to delivering exceptional customer service and a positive in-store experience. Happy and knowledgeable staff members can help customers navigate the store layout, offer design advice, and address inquiries effectively, creating a welcoming and supportive atmosphere.

8. Expand Digital Customer Engagement: In addition to enhancing the online shopping experience, IKEA can leverage digital channels for customer engagement beyond transactions. This could involve offering design inspiration, home improvement tips, and interactive content that fosters a sense of community among IKEA customers.

9. Continuous Innovation: Innovation should remain a core focus for IKEA, both in terms of product design and customer experience. Embracing emerging trends such as sustainable technology, circular economy practices, and smart home solutions can position IKEA as an industry leader that stays ahead of changing consumer demands.

By implementing these recommendations, IKEA can further solidify its strategic positioning, strengthen stakeholder relationships, and maintain its reputation as a forward-thinking and customer-centric brand in the competitive global furniture retail market.

 

Baraldi, E. and Ratajczak-Mrozek, M. (2019) ‘From supplier to center of excellence and beyond: The network position development of a business unit within “Ikea Industry”’, Journal of Business Research, 100, pp. 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.008.

Chang, H., Fernando, G.D. and Tripathy, A., 2015. An empirical study of strategic positioning and production efficiency. Advances in Operations Research, 2015.

Cote, C. (2020) Why is strategic planning important?: HBS Online, Business Insights Blog. Available at: https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/why-is-strategic-planning-important (Accessed: 08 August 2023).

Edvardsson, B., Enquist, B. and Hay, M., 2006. Values‐based service brands: narratives from IKEA. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 16(3), pp.230-246.

Eskerod, P., Huemann, M. and Savage, G. (2015) ‘Project stakeholder management—past and present’, Project Management Journal, 46(6), pp. 6–14. doi:10.1002/pmj.21555.

Flammer, C., Hong, B. and Minor, D., 2019. Corporate governance and the rise of integrating corporate social responsibility criteria in executive compensation: Effectiveness and implications for firm outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 40(7), pp.1097-1122.

Kim, Y.J., Song, J. and Koo, C., 2008. Exploring the effect of strategic positioning on firm performance in the e-business context. International Journal of Information Management, 28(3), pp.203-214.

Pedrini, M. and Ferri, L.M. (2019) ‘Stakeholder management: A systematic literature review’, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(1), pp. 44–59. doi:10.1108/cg-08-2017-0172.

Sammut-Bonnici, T. and Galea, D., 2014. SWOT analysis.

Smith, J. and Love, P.E. (2004) ‘Stakeholder management during Project Inception: Strategic Needs Analysis’, Journal of Architectural Engineering, 10(1), pp. 22–33. doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0431(2004)10:1(22).

Smudde, P.M. and Courtright, J.L. (2011) ‘A holistic approach to stakeholder management: A rhetorical foundation’, Public Relations Review, 37(2), pp. 137–144. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.01.008.

Tanwar, R., 2013. Porter’s generic competitive strategies. Journal of business and management, 15(1), pp.11-17.

Wu, K.J., Tseng, M.L. and Chiu, A.S., 2012. Using the Analytical Network Process in Porter's Five Forces Analysis–Case Study in Philippines. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57, pp.1-9.

WU, Y. (2019) ‘The Marketing Strategies of IKEA in China Using Tools of PESTEL, Five Forces Model and SWOT Analysis’, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research:International Academic Conference on Frontiers in Social Sciences and Management Innovation (IAFSM 2019), 403, pp. 348–355. doi:https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200207.054.

Yüksel, I., 2012. Developing a multi-criteria decision making model for PESTEL analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(24), p.52.