Delivering value through simplicity and cost efficiency

Jenny Bounmivilay

UX Researcher
Product Designer
Product Strategist
Figma
G2
As G2 Track's RFI project lead designer, I persuaded stakeholders to shift from a complicated RFP system to a simpler solution. This resulted in a faster design and build process, meeting user goals and rapidly validating our hypothesis.

Overview

G2 Track aims to be the single source of truth for managing software spend, contracts, account usage and compliance, and marketplace for software. 
The goal of this project was to explore ways for G2 Track to enable direct connections between users and software vendors to build early relationships.
Over the course of just a few weeks, I spearheaded the design of Request for Information (RFI) as the lead designer for the G2 Track team. Through a combination of research analysis, concept exploration, and product strategy, my goal was to take a broad, conceptual idea and deliver something valuable to our users and to the broader G2 organization.

Learning fast to move faster

I was brought into the project after the initial research phase and briefed on the current direction of the project: Request for Proposal (RFP), a formal method for software buyers to request proposals from software vendors.
Given the short timeframe, I needed to quickly analyze the research collected and synthesize my own insights to help move the project forward. 
Through concept testing, I found users did not resonate with the idea of creating an RFP.
Most users were curious but were unsure how to implement it into their current software procurement process. Others had no clue what an RFP was.
Results from testing proved too risky in releasing a feature that would fall flat of user expectations.
However, this didn’t mean that the project needed to be completely scrapped, rather we needed to change our hypothesis.
During my research, I discovered that organizations, regardless of size, participated in procurement processes, even without a formal procurement process in place.
Users wanted a better way to connect with vendors, but not necessarily through a formal process which would require a lot of cross-team collaboration in the beginning.

Influencing stakeholders

Although internal stakeholders were already strongly committed to the idea of RFP, I advocated building a less complex feature called Request for Information (RFI). This solution required less resources but still addressed our users’ goal.
Through my research, I found there were three types of commonly used documents in the software procurement process: Request for Information (RFI), Request for Proposal (RFP), and Request for Quote (RFQ). 
Three commonly used methods in the software procurement process: RFI / RFP / RFQ
Three commonly used methods in the software procurement process: RFI / RFP / RFQ
I communicated to stakeholders the pros and cons of both methods. Our users needed to be eased into a formal procurement process and our team was already working under extreme pressure. It also made business sense to first invest and learn from an MVP to help minimize cost. It became clear that building out an entire RFP system would create unnecessary frustration to our users, team, and organization.
Through striking a balance between user and business goals, my insights helped us move forward with a new direction: RFI.

Less work for more value

Within a week, I created visual prototypes encompassing all user flows and interactions that were successfully implemented by the engineers, resulting in faster learning and building.
Our pivot to a simpler solution facilitated faster design and development, ultimately enabling us to meet our users' goals and swiftly validate our hypothesis.
Partner With Jenny
View Services

More Projects by Jenny