The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
A productivity-focused Android application designed to help users schedule and manage phone calls instead of relying on manual reminders.
I developed the application using Kotlin, XML layouts, Android SDK, and modern Android development practices, focusing on a clean and intuitive scheduling experience. The app allows users to schedule calls for specific dates and times and manage their scheduled calls from a centralized interface.
The project involved working with Android background processing, notifications, scheduling logic, local data management, application state, and system-level phone functionality to make the scheduling workflow reliable and practical.
I also focused on creating responsive XML-based UI layouts, handling Android lifecycle requirements, managing scheduled tasks, and integrating the application's core functionality with Android's phone and notification systems.
This project demonstrates my experience building practical Android applications that combine custom UI development, system integrations, background functionality, scheduling, and reliable user workflows.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Challenges
View all
Related posts
Two ways to build the same fitness app.
A: AI-first. No tabs, no dashboards. The app is one conversation with a coach that already knows you slept six hours and squatted heavy on Tuesday. You log sets by talking. The plan rewrites itself mid-workout.
B: The modern standard. Home, today's workout, set-by-set logging, class booking, progress. Everything a member expects, done properly.
Same brand, same components, same build quality. The only real difference is how much you're asking the user to unlearn.
Most gyms should ship B. A few should bet on A.
Which one would you open tomorrow morning?
1 voted
25%
3 voted
75%
4 votes
Closed
Going with A here, the idea of the plan rewriting itself mid-workout instead of you scrolling a dashboard feels like where fitness apps eventually land. Would you actually ship the AI-first version to real users right now, or is it more of a thought experiment at this stage?
🎓 GROWTH TIP 07/30: DON’T JUST REWARD ACTIONS. MAKE PROGRESS TOO VALUABLE TO ABANDON.
Most learning apps treat gamification as a reward layer.
Complete a lesson → get XP.
Come back tomorrow → extend a streak.
Hit a milestone → unlock a badge.
Useful mechanics. But none of them creates retention on its own.
The stronger growth loop starts when every action makes the user feel like they’ve built something worth coming back to.
In this EdTech concept, a completed lesson doesn’t disappear.
It becomes part of a visible history.
History builds a streak.
The streak moves toward a milestone.
The milestone creates a reward.
And the next locked achievement creates anticipation.
Action → accumulation → anticipation → return.
That’s the difference between adding gamification and designing a progression system.
The goal isn’t to make learning feel like a game.
It’s to make accumulated progress feel valuable enough that leaving means walking away from something the user has already invested in.
The better question isn’t:
“How do we reward this action?”
It’s:
“How does this action increase the value of coming back?”
🔥 Streaks make consistency visible.
🏆 Milestones turn repetition into progress.
⭐ XP gives every session continuity.
🔒 Locked achievements give progress somewhere to go next.
One reward can create a moment.A connected progression system creates a reason to return.
#MobileDesign #GrowthUX #Gamification #EdTech #RetentionUX #ProductDesign #MobileApp #LearningUX #EngagementDesign #HabitDesign
👉 BOOK A MOBILE APP SESSION
https://calendly.com/asol_design/book-diagnostic-call-linkedin-clone
Excellent balance and structure. Keep up the great work!
I made two versions of a logo intro animation for my brand, Pixelblue, and can't decide which one's stronger.
To get an idea of the brand → Pixelblue Brand guidelines
Quick context: Pixelblue is a motion design studio focused on SaaS product demos, explainer videos, and social motion content. We've been doing this for 10+ years, mostly white-label, for agencies and marketing teams worldwide.
Would love your eyes on this: which version hits harder for you, and why? Pacing, reveal, timing, anything that stands out.
Drop your pick below (A or B) - genuinely curious what lands better from a fresh perspective.
7 voted
27%
19 voted
73%
26 votes
Closed
Going with B! Great work
