I was on a call with the owner of a major architecture firm in New York. The founder spent the first 20 minutes talking about their philosophy and abstract concepts. He was looking for a way to capture the soul of a space in their projects. They had a problem with the agencies they worked with. They'd spent large budgets only to receive logo proposals with stylized ancient temples, roofs, or building parts. They hated this literal approach. Architects and technical professionals often communicate conceptually. When this happens, it's better to bring the conversation back down to earth. So I shared my screen and showed him the identity I designed a few years ago for Emme. Emme is an Italian 3D architectural rendering studio I created the visual identity for. I showed him the action built into the typography. The letters are made of pixels simulating a render's calculation process. It's an approach that conveys deep abstraction without relying on trivial symbols. The founder suddenly stopped and said: "You managed to show what they do in a single word." That was exactly what they were looking for. Seeing that logotype was enough for him to understand I could turn an abstract idea into specific typography. The company's action and soul made visually tangible. Trust clicks the second a client realizes you can translate their philosophy into a visual system that works.

This looks clean and well thought out. How long did it take you to bring everything together?

Part 2 of my Claude + Webflow connector workflow

In the previous post, I shared why the "let Claude do it all" fantasy didn’t really work for me

This one is about what actually did 🙌

Slightly obsessive rules, healthy boundaries, and painfully earned trust issues that made our relationship useful without letting it ruin my Webflow projects (and nervous system)

The annoying and review questions seems to be key with any AI model creating output. And even responses to those questions can be hilarious as well lol.