The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
⚙️ Technical SEO isn’t about making a website complicated. It’s about removing friction for search engines.
Sometimes, a website doesn’t have a content problem.
It has a discovery problem.
A page can be well-written, useful, and optimized—but if search engines struggle to find, crawl, or understand it, its organic potential can be limited.
That’s why I look beyond rankings and ask:
🔎 Can Google discover the important pages?
🧭 Is the website structure helping search engines understand the site?
🔗 Are important pages properly connected through internal links?
📄 Are canonical and indexing signals clear?
⚡ Is the technical experience creating unnecessary friction?
Technical SEO is often invisible when it’s working well.
And that’s exactly the point.
Good technical SEO should make it easier for search engines to understand the website—not make the website harder to manage.
Before adding more content or chasing more keywords, sometimes the smarter move is to check whether the foundation is working properly.
📩 Want to find out what may be holding your website back technically?
Send me a message and let’s discuss your SEO goals.
#TechnicalSEO #SEO #SEOTips #SEOAudit #GoogleSearch #WebsiteOptimization #OrganicGrowth
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Challenges
View all
Related posts
A Canonical Tag Can Be Present and Still Point to the Wrong Page
A redesigned page can look right while its canonical tag points to an old URL. A check that only asks whether the tag exists will miss that mistake.
Before signing off the release, define which URL should represent each page, then check what the deployed website actually declares.
For example, imagine a workshop page available at both its clean address and a newsletter URL with tracking parameters. If they show the same workshop, both should declare the agreed clean URL. A separate workshop with different content needs its own decision.
For each page type, check:
• The expected canonical is written down before testing.
• The declaration in the initial HTML points to that URL, and JavaScript does not replace it with a different one.
• The target opens the intended page, with suitable crawl and indexing settings.
• Internal links, redirects and sitemap entries support the same preferred address.
A correct value in the CMS settings is only part of the evidence. Test the public page, including any alternate URLs that visitors actually use. Include another page built from the same template to see whether the problem repeats.
Keep the handoff short: requested URL, expected canonical, actual declaration, target response and the person responsible for correcting it. That gives a developer enough information to reproduce the problem and QA a specific condition to retest.
Then compare the implementation with Search Console's indexed record. Check the crawl date before using an older result to judge a new deployment. Google's selected canonical is a separate observation; a correct declaration does not guarantee that Google will choose it, and the live test cannot predict that choice.
The release check can establish that the website sends the intended signals. Record Google's later selection separately so the team can distinguish a deployed defect from an indexing decision.
I put together the implementation checks and examples in the full guide on Technical SEO Notes:
https://technicalseonotes.org/canonical-tags-purpose-examples-and-implementation-checks/
Projects and client work: NikoCodes
https://nikocodes.com/
13.9K clicks. 461K impressions. Average Google position of 8.1.
This is what consistent SEO work can look like over 12 months.
The focus is on improving organic visibility, attracting relevant visitors, and helping websites gain traction in Google Search without relying entirely on paid ads.
My SEO approach focuses on:
Technical SEO and website audits
On-page SEO and keyword optimisation
Indexing, sitemap and robots.txt improvements
Search performance tracking through Google Search Console
Ongoing optimisation based on real search data
Need help getting more organic traffic to your website?
If your website is struggling to rank, getting impressions without enough clicks, or not bringing in consistent organic traffic, let's talk.
Send me a message on Contra with your website URL, and I'll take a look at where your SEO can improve.
#SEO #TechnicalSEO #OrganicTraffic #GoogleSearchConsole #DigitalMarketing
Google AnalyticsYoast SEOseosearchengineoptimizationSearch Engine MarketingSEO Content Managment Search Engine OptimizationGoogle Search Console
A new backlink does not change your rankings overnight. This is one thing many people get wrong.
Google has to find the link, crawl it, and then decide how much it trusts the page that links to you. For most SaaS sites, this takes 2 to 8 weeks. Sometimes longer if the linking site is new or rarely crawled.
One common mistake: paying for a link, checking rankings after 5 days, and calling it a failure. Give each link time. Track your keyword position once a week and compare month to month, not day to day.
A good link needs patience. A fast judgment only creates doubt.
#SaaS #SEO #LinkBuilding #GuestPosting
So true. One thing that shortens the wait: make sure the linking page gets crawled at all. A guest post that nothing links to can sit undiscovered for weeks, so sharing it or linking to it from an author bio helps. And before starting the clock, check it's a plain followed link...