Real Estate Mobile App — UX/UI Design

Designed a modern real estate mobile experience that simplifies the journey of finding, exploring, and purchasing property.

This concept focuses on creating an intuitive, premium experience through clean navigation, personalized recommendations, and a visually immersive interface. Every screen was designed to reduce friction and help users make confident decisions.

What I worked on

• UX Research & User Flows • Information Architecture • Wireframing • High-Fidelity UI Design • Design System • Interactive Prototyping • Mobile App Design

Key Features

🏠 Property discovery with advanced search & filters

📍 Interactive map exploration

❤️ Save and compare favorite listings

💬 Agent messaging & communication

📅 Property viewing scheduler

📊 Mortgage & affordability calculator

🔔 Personalized recommendations

👤 User profile and saved searches

Design Approach

The interface embraces a modern dark theme with carefully balanced typography, generous spacing, and vibrant accent colors to create a premium yet accessible experience. The goal was to make browsing properties feel effortless while maintaining trust and clarity throughout the user journey.

Tools

• Figma • FigJam

I'm always excited to design products that solve real user problems while delivering polished, business-focused experiences.

I love this premium work 🔥😍

Grok 4.5 rebuilt our landing page and matched Opus 4.8. Until it hit one wall. I tested three things in this video (running at 16x): 1️⃣ Grok 4.5 through Grok Build 2️⃣ Can the agent copy existing products? 3️⃣ Does human taste break the loop? Results? Grok 4.5 is great. Same level of power as Opus 4.8 based on this test. Grok Build is fantastic and organized. It passed Antigravity CLI in my opinion. Clean, and it represents outputs perfectly. Packed with stuff borrowed from every existing agent, but stable. Most important: it doesn't burn tokens like OpenCode or Copilot. Running at High effort, it went from 500k to only 300k. Few agents pull that number these days. What did it build? We cloned the visual style of Creme Digital. Their site is built in Framer, so it comes with all the fancy effects out of the box. Ours is Astro js and Solid js. Unlike React, Solid has no rich UI library. No Aceternity, no Magic UI. We use Shadcn, but no glassmorphism magic, no bento cards, nothing. So Grok had to replicate that style from scratch. Write its own components. And respect the Solid and Astro architecture. If you built like this before the agentic era, you know that's a lot of work. Where did it fail? I gave it how to present pricing, illustrated as blocks in Excalidraw. I asked it to use GSAP morph to transition between them, keeping what's shared and animating only what changes. It couldn't do it. It just burned tokens. Claude!! Not you Sonnet 5. Opus 4.8 at High effort. Only to make sure it didn't break what Grok already built. The result is what you see. Now, why can't you see it from Algeria? Because this page is built for one persona. US and EU buyers who pay to save time. These are people with real skills and real markets. They have the money but not the hours. They could vibe code their way through it, but they don't want to invest in becoming developers. We invest fully in that so they don't have to. That's the philosophy I gave Grok while building: We go fast. We take responsibility. We do the dirty work. You get the polished product. And we sustain our own cash flow so we pay our talents on time, every single time. We pay them before their sweat dries. We almost added a button for Algerians. Instead of the Arabic switch, it would say "You Algerian? Go through the back door." The problem with that is how it can land differently. So, we dropped it. The truth is simple. The Algerian market won't pay like the US or EU. Common sense. Like Alex Hormozi says: sell to the rich, solve their problems, then serve your community. Different markets, different doors. We'll break down all our personas in a series of posts on the Ta9in - تقن. Follow along if this is your kind of thing.

This matches what I see too. Agents can get surprisingly close on an Astro landing page, but taste and product judgment still decide whether it actually ships.