The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Taste Test
Mobile is not a squeeze of the desktop layout
On desktop, you've got a sidebar. On mobile, most sites just shrink that same sidebar to fit a 320px screen, keep it a sidebar, and call it "responsive." But that's not actually responsive, it's just smaller.
A bottom sheet is the right call here, and not because it looks more app-like. It comes down to where people's thumbs naturally rest on the screen. The thumb touch point matters: controls someone reaches for most often should sit within easy thumb range at the bottom, not up top, where they have to shift their whole grip just to tap something.
Take a look at the desktop and mobile versions below. Which one actually feels built for how you hold your phone?
4 votes
Ends in 13h
Exactly. Responsive design should adapt to how people use the device, not just the screen size.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Trending
retrofuturism
Share your favorite designs from the past exploring the distant future. Or your own take on the aesthetic 🚀
halftone
Dots. Texture. Grain. Let's see your designs using the halftone technique.
Midjourney
Creatives are showing off what they're making with Midjourney.
colorgrade
Video editors sound off: How do you enhance the mood of your video in color grading?
Related posts
What should come first: the price or the value?
Version 1 presents the price immediately, making the offer transparent and easy to evaluate at a glance.
Version 2 introduces the program and its benefits first, giving users more context before revealing the investment.
One supports clarity and faster decision-making. The other builds interest before asking users to consider the price.
Which approach would make you more likely to explore the offer: seeing the price first or understanding the value first?
27 voted
47%
30 voted
53%
57 votes
Closed
My gut says value first, mostly because $497 cold with zero context reads like a paywall. Have you actually run this as a live A/B on real traffic, or is it more of a design gut-check for now?
SAME AI SKIN APP.
SAME DATA.
DIFFERENT PERCEPTION.
Which version makes the result feel more trustworthy?
🟣 A - Purple
🟢 B -Green
At first glance, this looks like a color choice.
But in a health product, color can change more than aesthetics.
It can change what users believe the product is.
🟣 One direction feels closer to premium skincare and self-care.
🟢 Another feels closer to health monitoring and measurable progress.
That matters because each category creates different expectations.
If it feels too cosmetic, AI results may feel less credible.
If it feels too clinical, it may lose emotional comfort.
The real UX question is not:
“Which color looks better?”
It is:
Which visual system makes you trust the result enough to scan again tomorrow?
👇 Vote below:
41 voted
55%
34 voted
45%
75 votes
Closed
Interesting how quickly “health” can shift into “beauty” just through visual language.
Back to working on Detach! here's a sneak peek of the new Appstore Screens!
The raccoon mascot is such a fun choice for a screentime app, most of these go clinical and cold. Did the illustration style come before or after you landed on Detach as the name?