Mobile is not a squeeze of the desktop layout On desktop, you've got a sidebar. On mobile, most s...Mobile is not a squeeze of the desktop layout On desktop, you've got a sidebar. On mobile, most s...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
On desktop, you've got a sidebar. On mobile, most sites just shrink that same sidebar to fit a 320px screen, keep it a sidebar, and call it "responsive." But that's not actually responsive, it's just smaller.
A bottom sheet is the right call here, and not because it looks more app-like. It comes down to where people's thumbs naturally rest on the screen. The thumb touch point matters: controls someone reaches for most often should sit within easy thumb range at the bottom, not up top, where they have to shift their whole grip just to tap something.
Take a look at the desktop and mobile versions below. Which one actually feels built for how you hold your phone?
Would you send an AI icon set straight to a client? 👀
I tested Ideogram Vector on a pixel icon set for Yue Fang, an interior decorator with Chinese inspirations. The icon set was for her services.
After a few tries & prompt refining, Ideogram nailed the vibe!
BUT, some things needed to be reworked:
➡️ the white parts were shapes stacked on top of a solid black shape, not real cutouts (surprise when you open the SVG 💀)
➡️ some pixels weren’t actually square
➡️ some pixels were bigger than others
➡️ icon sizes were all different
Pixel art is supposed to be the ONE style where everything sits on a grid lol
Stacked shapes instead of real cutouts is exactly the kind of flaw that only shows up when you open the file. AI gets the vibe fast, but the file-level check before handoff is still on us.