The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
I am an Architect, Furniture Designer, Interior Designer, and Graphic Designer with professional experience in delivering creative, functional, and visually compelling design solutions. I specialize in architectural design, interior planning, furniture development, and graphic visualization, ensuring that every project combines innovation, precision, and client-focused results.
I have advanced expertise in industry-standard software including SketchUp, Autodesk Revit, Autodesk AutoCAD, Adobe Illustrator, and MaxCut, along with professional rendering tools such as Lumion Pro for high-quality 3D visualizations and presentations.
I am committed to providing reliable, high-quality design services while maintaining clear communication and meeting project deadlines.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Challenges
View all
Related posts
Client’s choice vs. Designer’s choice 👀
I’m currently working on a branding project for Massage & Mocktails — a concept built around couples learning massage together in a relaxed, social atmosphere.
These are two early, black & white directions from Stage 2 of my branding process, before moving into color, typography, and the full visual system.
The interesting part?
My client chose Concept 1. I chose Concept 2.
Now I’m curious what other creatives think.
Which direction would you choose — 1 or 2? And why?
Sometimes the most interesting part of branding is seeing how differently a client and a designer respond to the same brief.
21 voted
44%
27 voted
56%
48 votes
Closed
Concept 2 for me. That interlocking figure mark reads as two people meeting, which is the actual brief here, so it gives you more to build a system on. Concept 1 is the safer, more literal pick, which is usually why clients reach for it.
The wide counters are what let it survive the home screen — in that grid of other app icons it still reads as one shape instead of collapsing into noise, which is the real test for a CRM mark. Is the gradient locked to the logo, or does it shift across the product surfaces?
An architecture studio's website shouldn't compete with its projects.
It should give them the right environment to be seen.
For this editorial architectural website, we explored a digital experience inspired by the visual language of architecture publications.
Large-scale photography creates the first impression. Typography establishes the tone. Generous spacing keeps the interface calm, while restrained navigation makes the portfolio easy to explore.
The design deliberately avoids filling every space with information.
Instead, each project gets room to communicate through imagery, composition and editorial pacing.
Services: Architecture Website Design · UI/UX Design · Editorial Web Design · Architectural Portfolio Design · Web Development
The goal was to create a website that feels like an extension of the studio's creative thinking quiet, confident and focused on the work.
Designed by WaxyWeb.
excellent