The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Taste Test
Designing for therapists means prioritizing what matters in the next few minutes, not just what looks good on a dashboard.
I explored two layout directions for a mental health practice management web app that helps psychologists manage sessions, patients, documentation, tasks, and follow-ups.
Both concepts use the same core widgets, but with different positioning and visual hierarchy. The goal was to make daily priorities easier to scan and act on.
Which option feels more intuitive - A or B? 🤔
17 votes
Ends in 9h
I choose A it was more managed I like how data is capped together it's nice good job 🎉🎉
sorting the day by what happens in the next five minutes, good lens
which direction feels more reassuring for therapists, B or A?
Leaning B, mostly because the session list sits where a therapist's eye lands first between appointments. Did any actual psychologists weigh in yet? Their gut pick might be totally different from what designers vote for.
Excellent work Anna.
I prefer A.
A option for me
A wins, todays schedules in that position is Nice
I really like both options, but A stands out to me. The layout feels more organized and the data is nicely grouped.
A for me. Designing for therapists means what matters in the next few minutes is the perfect lens, and A puts the session and patient info front and center where a busy clinician needs it. B is prettier but asks for more scanning. Function wins in a tool people use between appointments.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
A little design exploration for practice ✨
This time, I’m working on a concept for a lighting brand.
Which direction do you prefer?
74 voted
70%
31 voted
30%
105 votes
Closed
Atmospheric, for a lighting brand it feels almost unfair not to show the product actually doing its job in a real room. The minimal version reads more like a furniture catalog to me. Is Lumeria leaning toward a specific price point or market that would push this one way or the other?
Which Apple Vision Pro Landing Page Feels More Premium?
I'm exploring two visual directions for an Apple Vision Pro landing page concept and would love your feedback.
Option A: Dark cinematic interface with immersive spatial-computing vibes.
Option B: Soft lavender & light minimal interface with a premium Apple-inspired aesthetic.
Which version would you choose for a real product launch page, and why? Your feedback will help shape the final case study.
10 voted
59%
7 voted
41%
17 votes
Closed
Option A wins...Its visual appearance suddenly grad against Option B!!
AEROVA - Brand Direction
Exploring two visual directions for AEROVA, a wind-energy brand built around the idea of “Invisible force. Visible progress.”
Both directions use the same identity system, but create a different feeling:
Option A - Deep Green
Option B - Soft Blue
Which direction feels stronger for AEROVA?
27 voted
77%
8 voted
23%
35 votes
Closed
The soft blue palette feels more airy and closer to wind energy! Deep green is so overused in the energy industry so definitely option B.