I opened Coca-Cola's refresh expecting to spend my time comparing the before and after. Instead, ...I opened Coca-Cola's refresh expecting to spend my time comparing the before and after. Instead, ...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
I opened Coca-Cola's refresh expecting to spend my time comparing the before and after.
Instead, I kept wondering what the conversation inside the room must've been.
Because this doesn't feel like a brand trying to reinvent itself.
It feels like a brand looking at everything people already associate with Coca-Cola and deciding to trust those things even more.
The ribbon is more prominent. The script has more presence. The whole system feels cleaner. But NONE of those decisions are trying to make Coca-Cola feel new.
If anything, they're trying to make it feel even more familiar.
I think that's what I enjoyed most about this refresh.
There's a lot of discipline in resisting the urge to add another idea simply because you can.
At some point, the job stops being about creating new brand assets and becomes about protecting the ones that have already earned their place in people's minds.
Maybe that's the difference between a growing brand and an iconic one.
One is still searching for its identity.
The other already knows it.
Post image
Post image
Maty's avatar
The distinction you make between protecting vs reinventing is brilliant. This feels like the strategy every legendary brand should consider. Do you think this approach would work differently for newer brands still building their identity?
Chhavi's avatar
Formeta.studio logo
Yes, and that’s actually the most important distinction. For newer brands, the temptation is to keep evolving because you haven’t found your thing yet. But the risk is confusing your audience before they’ve even had the chance to recognise you.
Coca-Cola’s lesson only works once...
Maty's avatar
"Choose deliberately enough that you'll want to protect it later" is a great way to put it, that reframes consistency as a future-facing decision instead of just a rulebook constraint. I'll push back slightly though, isn't there a risk of choosing too deliberately too early, before you've actually tested what resonates?
Chhavi's avatar
Formeta.studio logo
There's definitely a risk of choosing too deliberately before you've learned anything. But I'd distinguish between committing to a direction and locking in every execution detail. You can and SHOULD test copy angles, visual styles, messaging. The deliberate part is- what is this...
Ansh's avatar
Formeta.studio logo
Interesting take, the refresh doubled down on what worked for them:)
Chhavi's avatar
Formeta.studio logo
Back to feed
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started